The Forum > Article Comments > Princess Diana's death - the social impact > Comments
Princess Diana's death - the social impact : Comments
By Mal Fletcher, published 1/9/2017Twenty years ago today, Britain and the world lost one of the seminal figures - at least in terms of public affection - of the millennial era.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
-
- All
Posted by Is Mise, Sunday, 3 September 2017 8:56:44 PM
| |
Medicare covers pathology tests for amount of blue blood to prove the right to rule:
Activated Partial Thromboplastin time (APTT) Light Blue Done Daily. Of course , democracy may require 150 kings for Australia , with travel , palace and horse money. Posted by nicknamenick, Sunday, 3 September 2017 9:31:17 PM
| |
Dear Is Mise,
Princess Diana was a unique Royal. She had the capacity to reach people and touch people's lives. She was the "People's Princess," and the entire world cried when she died. This does not happen for ordinary people. You may consider her as ordinary, however there are millions around the globe who would disagree with you, myself included. The following link explains her achievements and how effective she was: http://www.biographyonline.net/people/diana/achievements_princess_diana.html Posted by Foxy, Monday, 4 September 2017 10:52:05 AM
| |
Foxy,
Millions around the world can be wrong, sheer numbers is no guide; the fact that millions celebrated the New Millenium as commencing in 2000 instead of 2001 is proof positive of how easily public opinion can be swayed. Diana was not the brightest candle in the room and had she not married into the limelight was destined to a career in odd jobs and remaining an unknown. Posted by Is Mise, Monday, 4 September 2017 12:42:02 PM
| |
Dear Is Mise,
I'll take the reactions of millions to the Princess of Wales instead of your singular one. What either of us think really does not matter in the great scheme of things. The Princess will go down in the pages of history and will forever be remembered for the compassion she showed to the most vulnerable, for the hard work that she did for all the charities and organisations that she supported and the funds she raised for them, for her work towards having land-mines banned and so much more. It's been 20 years since her death - yet she is not forgotten. Not a bad achievement in itself. What other Royal is remembered so affectionately 20 years after their death - by not only the UK but globally? Posted by Foxy, Monday, 4 September 2017 2:00:01 PM
| |
//What other Royal is remembered so affectionately 20 years
after their death// Just limited to England? Alfred the Great, Harold Godwinson, William the Conqueror, Richard the Lionheart, Richard III, Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, Charles II, Victoria, amongst others... Proper royals, as opposed to rich tarts that married well. Posted by Toni Lavis, Monday, 4 September 2017 5:28:42 PM
|
"If an aristocrat falls in a forest and there is nobody there to hear it, does anybody care?"
Kith and kin, insurance company for starters!