The Forum > Article Comments > Princess Diana's death - the social impact > Comments
Princess Diana's death - the social impact : Comments
By Mal Fletcher, published 1/9/2017Twenty years ago today, Britain and the world lost one of the seminal figures - at least in terms of public affection - of the millennial era.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
-
- All
No. Princess Diana was not an ordinary woman by any
stretch of the imagination. She was the first wife
of the Prince of Wales and mother of royalty.
She came from the Spencer family, one of Britain's
pre-eminent aristocratic families whose family
members have been made knights, baronets, and peers.
Her father was Viscount Althorp.
As for being out of her depth? Hardly. A woman who
was "out of her depth" as you put it, would not
have achieved what Princess Diana did in both reaching
out to people and raising funds in the millions for
the charities and organisations that she supported.
She also raised awareness for so many causes - including
mental illness, aids, land-mines, the plight of lepers,
and so on. A woman out of her depth would not have
had the effect that she did on the people of England or
globally which was shown by the reaction of people to
her death. Everyone felt the loss worldwide. And today
20 years after her death - it still resonates with most
people.
As for the media? Yes they are making money out of it
all. They always have. However, if she was just an
"ordinary woman out of her depth," as you claim I doubt
if the media would give her the time of day.