Gee Dave your back so soon,with the same old propaganda from the same old suspects,your losing Dave slowly or Tick,Tick,Tick as Hannity says before all his BS hit the rock of reality

Yet again David is pushing his Jewish agenda by subtly bending the truth: suddenly the conflict is named "Jewish-Arab" (occurring 4 times in the article), the occupation is called "Jewish" and then he argues for the legitimate right of "the Jewish people" to establish their home, "incidentally" at the same spot where Israel is already established.

David cares not and has no respect for Israel: for him, the citizens of Israel are mere donkeys, created to fulfil his Jewish ambitions and to be maimed and killed for it if necessary. He wouldn't do the fighting himself, he wouldn't risk his own blood, sweat and tears, he won't dirty his own hands with moral dilemmas, he won't thereafter feel the remorse for making the wrong choices, but he wants Israelis to do all that, to be his useful idiots so he can enjoy the fruits of them fighting for his ideas.

Hahaha
Trump.
Hahahaha

More racist propaganda embedded in faux-legalistic BS from OLO's resident race supremacist.

There are dozens of Jewish homelands like Australia in which Jews are neither underdogs nor overlords, just equal citizens with everyone else.

Israel is not such a homeland, and its Jewish inhabitants are exposed to ongoing danger resulting from the arrogant racism of its history, its territorial aggression and its phoney "Law of Return".

This was not a danger to Jews who lived in Palestine before the terrorist Nakba of 1948, but it is now.

#Yuyutsu

You state:
"Yet again David is pushing his Jewish agenda by subtly bending the truth: suddenly the conflict is named "Jewish-Arab" (occurring 4 times in the article), the occupation is called "Jewish" and then he argues for the legitimate right of "the Jewish people" to establish their home, "incidentally" at the same spot where Israel is already established."

Please note the following errors in your statement:

1. I have been using the term "Jewish-Arab conflict" in all my articles because that is the factual truth. The conflict in Palestine between Arabs and Jews began in about 1915 - not in 1948 - long before there were "Israelis" and "Palestinians". This conflict is still current in 2017.

2. The Mandate in 1922 spoke of the reconstitution of the Jewish National Home in Palestine and it gave the Jews the right to settle not only "at the same spot where Israel is already established" but also in Judea and Samaria (West Bank) and Gaza.

3. Like it or not - it was the terms "Jews" and "Jewish" that drove the League of Nations to act as it did.

4. The "West Bank" never existed until 1950 when the Jordanians tried to obliterate their correct historical and geographical names - "Judea and Samaria"

Wiping out all traces of any Jewish history and occupation for thousands of years is a favourite pastime of the Arabs - and it would seem yours as well.

That you choose to swallow that Arab propaganda hook, line and sinker merely shows how successful their false and malicious brainwashing has been.

Don't appreciate your ad hominem attacks either. Ignoring the message by trying to shoot the messenger shows an intellectual inability to discuss the message and point out its shortcomings with reasoned arguments. Maybe there is nothing you can find fault with so you have to resort to personal abuse.

That is your problem - not mine.

You are not on your own - as most comments posted to my articles do not discuss their content matter. Guess they too find the contents unchallengeable and the facts indisputable.

Note how the resident racist insists on the supremacist term "Jewish NATIONAL homeland". As if this ethnic group, distributed around the world as widely as Celts, constitutes a "nation". This gets him out of admitting that Australia and nations like it are Jewish homes but not Jewish NATIONAL homes. Equality, not supremacy for which this spokesman for Zionism (a racist cult) pursue the hasbara for which as a lawyer he is engaged.