The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Archaic obstacles: Australia, parliament and dual citizenship > Comments

Archaic obstacles: Australia, parliament and dual citizenship : Comments

By Binoy Kampmark, published 21/7/2017

It is a provision that nabs the unsuspecting member of Parliament who discovers, by self-pursuit or otherwise, that he or she is, in fact, seized of the loyalty of another state.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. 9
  9. Page 10
  10. All
And don't come back with the, The- This isn't your country it is an Aboriginal country.

Every country in the world is held by conquering armies.
There are few countries who haven't been involved in conquest or tribal warfare,
except lost remote jungle tribes.

The Aboriginies were a Stone Age tribe. Britain built the lot. Every town and city
library and public building you see in Australia. The law courts, ethnic groups run to for justice,were built and bought into being by the British.
Everything!

Without the British and American weaponry and know how, the aborigines would have
lost the country to the Japanese.
And probably the Indonesians would have taken the country long before then,
if they didn't know the British were here and could well defeat them at that time in history.

No country in the world is said to be the owners of a country, if they don't have the army backing up the government.

So believe me when I say, at the present time in history, this country is owned and run by the British. That of course could end in the future with our declining birth rate, and
our belief in justice and a fair go. In fact we are too caring and fair for our own good.

So don't insult my intelligence by telling me that at this point in history This country Isn't
Brutish owned.
Posted by CHERFUL, Tuesday, 25 July 2017 10:41:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yeah,yeah,yeah, brutish regarding armies is probably correct, but it was my spell checker, and I meant British.
Posted by CHERFUL, Tuesday, 25 July 2017 10:46:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. 9
  9. Page 10
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy