Plantagenet (to Yuyutsu),
"Your point about Geoff of Perth's profound ignorance of Israeli humanitarianism is well put."

Which ignorance?
The ignorance about Israel supporting Jihadi's in their war against Syria?
Or the ignorance about providing medical aid to those Jihadi's that go on to kill civilians?

Did you forget this story?
http://www.timesofisrael.com/russia-mossad-other-foreign-agents-killed-in-aleppo-strike/
How about this one?
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/cheney-rothschild-fox-news-murdoch-drilling-oil-syria-violation-intl-law/

It's all about their humanitarianism is it?
Just like when Israel bombs kids on beaches or shoots unarmed Palestinian kids for something to do?
No potential conflicts of interests that you can put your finger on in the above links?
No, Of course not.

I'd argue that Geoff isn't ignorant at all, the real question is your ignorance.
Is it real or is it just bias?

The author mentioned the 1965 Immigration bill...
Israel was behind the push for that bill.
And soon after Americans were required to start locking up their homes.

Armchair Critic.

Perhaps if the Palestinians don't want stray rockets killing kids on beaches
they shouldnt lob rockets into Israel, or use schools to fire rockets from.

Occupied territories......

No mention of the 6day war, but then the Arabs and Palestinians,never do
mention it. When 4 Arab states attacked Israel and got there a...se's kicked
in 6 days by the Israelies

The Arabs never mention it, because there might be a reason that Israel occupied
those territories. Plus the Palestinians are always building underground tunnels
into Israel. 15 tunnels were discovered in the last flare up of hostilities.

Kind of gives Israel a reason to hang on to those territories as a buffer zone, between
Israel and Palestine.

The Arabs are good at propaganda they are not so good at the truth.

Referendumdrivensocietyh

I too want American and Australian soldiers to stop being sent to fight laws in other countries.
That means we pull out of the United Nations. Defend our borders at home
and let the rest of the dam world look after itself.
It is too costly in lives and economic resources.
There could have been a lot more hospitals built with that money and pensioners live below the poverty line.

The American leadership never seems to know what side they should be on anyway.
When I say bring the troops home and protect our borders at home, This means
shutting the borders to all people who will never become loyal to our people
and thus will always pose a threat in the long term

Protecting our borders at home will be much less expensive and for god sake let
Our leaders show some brains in who they let in. Sure, you might still
get home grown terrorists for a generation, but as they plot they will be arrested and weeded out and we
Won't be letting new ones in.

I am in favour of America and Russia fighting together to protect
Europe and the world from these ratbag extremists.
Only I realised they should be allies a couple of decades ago.

America sided against Russia when they were fighting the mujahadeen
in Afghanistan. That was back in the 1970's. And who was fighting the Russians
With the mujahadeen back then, a Young man wearing a long white robe and beard,
Osama Bin Laden. Maybe the Russians would have killed him, and we wouldn't
have had 9/11. The Americans supported the wrong side as usual, but then
Our schools didn't teach much in the West about, how the ottoman,Islamic empire
wiped out as many Europeans and Christians as they could in Europe back then.

Too busy reading about the holacaust, over and over.

Is David Singer not usually a left wing globalist or am I mixing him up with someone else.

I hate Trump and Putin, but it's good that they do not allow immigrants...