The Forum > Article Comments > Palestine: Brexit 1922 key to Trump resolving Arab-Jewish conflict > Comments
Palestine: Brexit 1922 key to Trump resolving Arab-Jewish conflict : Comments
By David Singer, published 23/11/2016Instead of pursuing the misguided notion of
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
Posted by Billyd, Sunday, 4 December 2016 3:25:02 PM
| |
Quote: [David Singer]
"How can Israel be a racist state when 20% of its citizens are comprised of Moslem Arabs and Christian Arabs?" Quite easily, by passing discriminatory laws. http://mondoweiss.net/2015/06/database-discriminatory-israel/ Posted by Billyd, Sunday, 4 December 2016 5:24:51 PM
| |
Mr Singer claims the item I cited has no genetic definition.
Reopen it Mr Singer Scroll to Law of Return clause 1. Parse the second word. Repeat. On the second point. Under Australian law the (initially foreign) wife of a person born in Australia is eligible for full for full Australian citizenship. There are absolutely no restrictions on that person carrying an Australian passport and leaving and entering Australia at will. So far as I know this is true of people who marry citizens of any non-racist country in the world. This not so of racist Israel and no lawyerly thrashing about will make it so. Israel is an illegitimate racist settler state artificially embedded (for the time being) in Palestine. To the rest of the world it is a source of constant instability and will remain so until - like its defunct ally the racist Boer Republic of South Africa - it is dismantled. Posted by EmperorJulian, Sunday, 4 December 2016 6:07:52 PM
| |
#Billyd
So your position is that despite Jews and Arabs both being made promises the Arabs should get all the liberated Ottoman Empire territories and the Jews not a skerrick. Spoken like a true Jew-hater. Like most Jew haters- when they lose out on one issue - the allocation of the Ottoman Empire territory between Jews and Arabs - they seek to raise another issue - the 1967 Six Day War - to peddle their Jew hatred. You make the following snide and unsubstantiated assertion: "The FACT here is Israel attacked Egypt to start the 1967 war, with the spurious claim that it was pre-emptive, " That claim is not spurious. Perhaps you should look at the following timeline to find out why Israel was totally justified in launching its attack on 6 June 1967 http://www.sixdaywar.co.uk/timeline.htm #Billyd The Adalah list of supposed discriminatory laws relied on by you is a load of garbage. Are you suggesting Israel should not have appointed a custodian for Arab properties and compile a Register to enable claimants of those properties to seek compensation or ownership. Is that discriminatory? Are you suggesting the Jewish state recognised by the United Nations was being discriminatory in giving any Jew the right to migrate to that Jewish State especially after six million Jews had been exterminated during the previous decade? You need counselling mate. Jew hatred is a disease and you have got it bad. #Emperor My last comment to Billyd is equally applicable to you. Israel is not "an illegitimate racist settler state artificially embedded (for the time being) in Palestine." It is a member of the United Nations and complies in all respects with the legal conditions required by the 1934 Montevideo Convention. The only thing that is embedded is your Jew-hatred. Posted by david singer, Thursday, 8 December 2016 4:49:21 PM
| |
I think I have him parsed.
Demands for and implementation of superior status on genetic grounds constitute racism. If the superior status is Jewish then the above must not apply. To reject this special exception is Jew hatred. That pretty much sums Mr Singer, and those for whom he trolls, up. A racist. Choosing Jews as the race in question, and dragging in the Nazi Holocaust as a (phoney) exemplar, is SELF-RIGHTEOUS racism. To oppose racism locks decent people into opposing any state based on overt racism. Not only opposing this or that crime it commits but opposing its existence and opposing any assistance to keep it viable. Posted by EmperorJulian, Thursday, 8 December 2016 5:22:57 PM
| |
#Emperor
You state: "To oppose racism locks decent people into opposing any state based on overt racism. Not only opposing this or that crime it commits but opposing its existence and opposing any assistance to keep it viable." What other states based on your understanding of "overt racism" have been similarly the subject of your vitriol? Give me some links of posts you have made on the subject in relation to those other states. Guess I misjudged you. You are not a Jew-hater... you are a rabid Jew-hater. Posted by david singer, Friday, 9 December 2016 7:51:53 PM
|
My comment about promises during WW1 was in response to your insinuation that only Jews were made promises.
Yes, there were Jewish battalions in WW1, supply units mostly, some disbanded two years before the end of the war, how many fought and died for Palestine?
The FACT here is Israel attacked Egypt to start the 1967 war, with the spurious claim that it was pre-emptive, then set about stealing what land the Palestinians had left. This is what the present situation is about, not the founding of Israel, as the Palestinians have already stated. Israel does not want a solution, the status quo suits the to the ground, and in Netenyahu they have the perfect person to ensure a solution will never be found.