The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Clinton will continue Obama policy of confronting Russia in Syria and the UN > Comments

Clinton will continue Obama policy of confronting Russia in Syria and the UN : Comments

By David Singer, published 18/10/2016

Clinton’s no-fly zone over Libya proved disastrous and has already been rejected by Russia over Syria.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
Hillary Clinton should be put on trial for war crimes, breaching national security, corruption, involvement in assassinations of people opposing Clinton interests and more. Hopefully the electoral system will not be corrupted enough for her to become President. The USA has become a corporate empire supported by the military and CIA to benefit wealthy and powerful interests rather than the American people while claiming it is "spreading democracy". The power brokers, who largely control the Western mainstream media are doing all they can to discredit Trump who should reduce the costly warmongering they effectively support.

Thanks to alternate news sites and the social media on the Internet, the scams are increasingly being exposed. Especially that the supposed civil war in Syria has been other countries, particularly USA covertly creating and sponsoring nominally Muslim terrorist groups to try and overthrow the most democratic and secular government in the Middle East and install their own puppets and stooges. The main US interest is aiming to build a gas pipeline across Syria to take Qatari gas to Europe and displace Russia from this market. Israel would like to have Syria broken up into small Muslim states fighting each other rather than challenging itself with the future possibility of it picking them off later to create an enlarged "Greater Israel". However, fortunately the Syrians are now destroying these dreams with help from Russia, Iran and Hezbellah getting rid of terrorists.

Hopefully Clinton will not become President, but if she does, hopefully by then there will be few terrorists left in Syria to support and the war hawks will back off from directly supporting them. They will have to directly challenge the "dug in" Russian military to do so
Posted by mox, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 9:12:36 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A respectable non-bias article David, nice job.

The US has truly shown itself for what it is.
Arming terrorists, proxy wars, regime changes.
They don't want to work with anyone else; they wish to keep their global hegemony at any cost and dictate to the rest of the world.

From what I understand they are already planning M/E war scenarios based on a Clinton Presidency and holding out for policy changes under her leadership.

Hillary is a rape enabling sociopath, drunk on money and power; and she has sold the American people out to get it.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 10:06:32 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Singer's article leans heavily on Hillary Clinton's strategies to remedy the problem of ISIS in Syria. But I wonder what America was thinking when Rand Paul asked her about gun-running out of Benghazi via Turkey to Syria, which ultimately armed ISIS.

Note that H.Clinton had to ultimately take the blame for the Benghazi attacks, which many have testified included the culpable stand-down of forces that could have saved the four who died at the embassy -- including the US Ambassador, John Christopher Stevens. Clinton also lied several times that the attacks were a result of Muslims upset over an anti-Muslim video, which was conclusively proven to be an outright lie.

How could America elect such a reprehensible character?

Scroll to 2:20 on the video where Rand Paul asks about gun-running.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jriU_cPU9Vk
Posted by Ingongruous, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 10:44:46 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
You think, maybe, perhaps? It must be such a comfort David, to know you're always right!
Alan B.
Posted by Alan B., Tuesday, 18 October 2016 10:49:44 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It seems the US Democrat (including Hillary) line is endless US fighting in a country (with no mechanism to win). This achieves endless US control of that country. It is essential that the occupied country has strategic value and even more valuable, oil.

The US Democrat line is that Russia should have no role in the Middle East at all - no matter what progress Russia involvement is causing. This follows the broader US policy - that the US does not tolerate any non-Western powers in America's backyard, which is the Middle East.
Posted by plantagenet, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 12:41:07 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Recently the Rothschild Banking Dynasty held a $100,000.oo per plate fund raiser for Hillary. They own her like they do most Western Govts with the exception of Russia, China, Syria, ,Iran,Iceland and few others.

This war is all about who owns the debt money creation system which totally enslaves the masses.
Posted by Arjay, Tuesday, 18 October 2016 7:15:49 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy