The Forum > Article Comments > White Australia’s foreign affairs policy > Comments
White Australia’s foreign affairs policy : Comments
By Ali Kazak, published 26/9/2016Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull asked 'Is the Labor party’s foreign policy for sale?' yet consecutive Liberal and Labor governments have been selling Australia’s foreign policy to Israel for decades with cash and free trips.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
Posted by Bazz, Monday, 26 September 2016 6:00:15 PM
| |
Ali, did you make this up all yourself, or did you have a few delusional assistants.
If you did it yourself, there must have been some substance abuse to produce this:” consecutive Liberal and Labor governments have been selling Australia’s foreign policy to Israel for decades with cash and free trips, putting its interests above Australia’s national interests and dancing to the tune of its extremist lobby.” None of your nonsense has evidence to support it. Who did you think you could fool with this rubbish? Posted by Leo Lane, Monday, 26 September 2016 10:59:25 PM
| |
Leo Lane,
If you can't accept the truth from a Palestinian, then how about from a Jew? http://antonyloewenstein.com/2012/08/16/australian-zionist-lobby-keen-to-brain-wash-young-student-leaders-in-israel/ Posted by Armchair Critic, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 7:41:24 AM
| |
Armchair Critic:
I take it you are also bitter about not having been invited on any of those trips. Most of us are adults who can make up our own minds when presented with the Israeli point of view. That's what those trips are about - a way of expressing the Israeli viewpoint, which you are free to either accept or reject. You are always welcome to travel to the Palestinian territories for an opposing view. Posted by Avw, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 6:08:16 PM
| |
@Bazz, Monday, 26 September 2016 5:11:27 PM
Fair comment Bazz; after all, how dare those pesky Moslems ignore the Roman Senate's designation of Herod (the Great) as: "King of the Jews"? This occurred around 40 BCE I believe. Posted by Pilgrim, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 11:41:08 PM
| |
Thanks, AC, for the link.
On the face of it, Lowenstein’s account is believable, while the style and content of Ali’s output, puts it immediately in doubt as to its veracity. Whether written by a jew or a Palestinian was not a relevant factor in considering the prima facie impression of the documents, so I did not consider your remark appropriate, in seeking to imply a prejudice on my part. The form and content of Ali’s article invited my denigration, not his nationality. Posted by Leo Lane, Wednesday, 28 September 2016 2:20:02 AM
|
mental reasoning is damaged. He may well be descended from thousands of
years of cousin marriage, and it makes the decisions other people make
difficult to understand.
Their statements that the Jews never lived in Israel then makes sense.
I suspect this the reason governments have so much trouble coming to
grips with Islam. It leads to politicians, media etc making excuses
and trying to avoid publicising that the offender was a moslem in
many of cases that are committed by Islamists.