You have made quite an effort, mhaze, but you are aware that Max is a proven dunce, and quite resistant to learning, as all dunces are.
He produces four Hiroshima bombs of fraudulent support for AGW per day, and should never be taken seriously.
He still asserts that humans have a measurable effect on climate, despite the fact that there is no science to support what Robert Carter has shown to be nonsense

Leo

You made a mistake when you stated:

"You have made quite an effort, mhaze, but you are aware that .......is a proven dunce...."

It should read "... Leo Lane is a proven dunce ...."

The reason being you state that the referenced work below, is not science, only a fool would have such a notion:

http://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2016-046_0.pdf

Also, how do you explain the forcing of all greenhouse gases including CO2 for 2015 being 2.974 Watts/square metre?

Hi mhaze, you cherrypicked the globally inconclusive statements to downplay the known increases in regional events. I’ve not seen you truly acknowledge the regional events, or how serious they are *already* becoming. You cherrypicked the Working Group to try and disprove any extreme weather events.
http://forum.onlineopinion.com
 
You smugly dismissed the Working Group’s Summary for Policy makers, which summarises the data findings *and* forward projections, while pretending in the previous post to respect the Working Group. 
http://forum.onlineopinion.com
 
But instead we find that we have already seen increases in the frequency AND intensity of heatwaves and droughts in some regions, as well as other events. The future is worse, and if the peer-reviewed science says we should be concerned, I’d believe them over a cherrypicking denialist I had the misfortune to bump into on the internet. I’m glad you’re not in charge of the world or you would drive us straight at a cliff at 150 clicks, and only after we smashed through the barrier and gone over the edge would you declare: “Now we can worry about it!”
 
“If I say the weather in WA today is bright and sunny, its rather incongruous to 'disprove' that by telling me the forecast for Sydney tomorrow is for rain.
Posted by mhaze, Tuesday, 13 September 2016 1:59:35 PM
http://forum.onlineopinion.
 
D’uh! Your cherrypicking and deceit and lack of real respect for science have disqualified your opinion from even mattering. Goodbye. (Smacks hand to forehead for having stooped to ‘feeding the troll’.)

The flea, addressing me said”“ you state that the referenced work below, is not science”
That is a lie. I took an extract from a reference posted by the flea, and showed specifically the nonsense in his reference. It is ridiculous for a purported scientific document to include what I had extracted. I will post below a copy of what I said.. Nowhere did I make the statement asserted by the muddle headed, disingenuous flea.I only read one paragraph of the document, and commented on that Copy of my post:
“The flea posted a link to what he calls “science”. This is the first paragraph of the pathetic rubbish to which he has linked:
“The scale of ocean warming is truly staggering with the numbers so large that it is difficult for most people to comprehend.” Even the flea could not be so ignorant as to mistake that for science, but he has wasted my time looking at it, and that satisfies his urge to be an ignorant pest.
You have the gall to talk about “science”, flea, when you have no comprehension of what the word means, and continually demonstrate your ignorance.
You have been asked for your qualification in science before, flea, and in your usual uncivil, pig-ignorant manner you ignore the question. I ask you again, flea, what is the qualification which is the basis of your tenuous presumption that you can speak about science as if you know what you are talking about, when you obviously do not.
Posted by Leo

Sorry, it appears the software I was using changed the urls.

Mhaze's debut into extreme weather was here. It's the extreme cherrypicking version of 'denialist truth' where only the bits they want you to read are true.
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=18419#327516

He then tries to create a divide between the science of the Working Group and Summary for Policy Makers, when if he had actually READ the Working Group paper the summary is all in there!

"We are both quoting from the same report, sort of. But I'm quoting from the Working Groups. You, unsurprisingly, go to the SPM. Science v. politics"
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=18419#327522

As Mhaze said SO IRONICALLY: "Always believe the peer-reviewed science...unless it doesn't tell you what you want to hear. In that case go with the self-interested assertion."

If only mhaze actually focussed that at himself. I wonder, does he also believe the Moon Landing was faked, the moon is actually made of cheese, and 9/11 was an inside job of the government, orchestrated by an Alien Elvis who actually still lives in a UFO hovering invisibly over Gracelands? Makes you wonder.... it's all a conspiracy... science versus science (coughs) I mean policy.... such an enormous conspiracy, can they read my minds mhaze? Have you got a tinfoil hat handy?

Mhaze's FIFTH CHERRYPICK
"there is low confidence in observed trends in small-scale severe weather phenomena such as hail and thunderstorms because of historical data inhomogeneities and inadequacies in monitoring systems”
P216.

This one is again comforting, as the severe thunderstorms and hail events have not gone too awry around the planet as a whole, yet, but are starting to rev up in some regions.

ALSO ON THE SAME PAGE:
"who found an increasing frequency of severe hail events in Ontario, Canada during the period 1979–2002 and Kunz et al. (2009), who found that hail days significantly increased during the period 1974–2003 in southwest Germany. Hailpad studies from Italy (Eccel et al., 2012) and France (Berthet et al., 2011) suggest slight increases in larger hail sizes and a correlation between the fraction of precipitation falling as hail with average summer temperature while in Argentina between 1960 and 2008 the annual number of hail events was found to be increasing in some regions and decreasing in others (Mezher et al., 2012)."

Seriously, does the username even indicate what he is? Is it short for "Me Haze"? Is that all we're dealing with here? Is this all just one big joke to him?