The Forum > Article Comments > Rock star-scientist Brian Cox confused on more than global temperatures > Comments
Rock star-scientist Brian Cox confused on more than global temperatures : Comments
By Jennifer Marohasy, published 18/8/2016Richard Horton, the current editor of the medical journal, The Lancet, recently stated that, 'The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.'
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Page 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- ...
- 61
- 62
- 63
-
- All
Posted by ant, Saturday, 27 August 2016 10:30:39 AM
| |
Given the tenor and content of many posts here I have assembled some information with references into a pdf file. Some may find it useful, some not.
"Thomas O’Reilly research findings, analysis and opinionated conclusions regarding Jennifer Marohasy, John Abbot and the IPA OLO in general over Climate Science's validity, the disinformation being spread, and the default adhominem attacks against those engaged in this critical aspect of Scientific research. I only found this place because of Marohasy's article and criticisms of Brian Cox, the BOM, and the whole edifice of Climate Science and that arose out of the Q&A program that hosted Senator-Elect Malcolm Roberts from One Nation and long term member of the science denying Galileo movement. Since the 18th of August on the Online Forum (OLO) there's been NO reply to questions or requests for data from many posters. No comments on the evidence presented. So what if it conflict with existing beliefs ... isn't exactly what dialogue on online forums is supposed to be about ... sharing different views and info? URL http://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-M0yAR0UPhPbXkzb1RlVGJaZFU Topics covered: Jennifer Marohasy John Abbot IPA Orthodoxy AGW/CC Science Conspiracy rubbish GrahamY Algae waterfront properties JBowyer Armchair Critic climate scientists ideological beliefs "Dirty" Harry the BOM evidence Auditor-General weather forecasting Climate Modelling Laboratory John Nicol GCMs ANNs Analysis GHG Effect ideological vested-interests political solutions Central Queensland University B. Macfie Family Foundation Doctorates in Paradise Climate Lab Tax-Deductible 'charity' "New Climate" magazine Stock market trading Dr George Bryant Macfie? Medical doctor? Macfie Energy Pty Ltd new religion infecting science Strike Resources Myth and The Murray group IPA book Alan Moran dumped by IPA George Christensen MP coal industry GBR tourism industry Global Warming had stopped? temperature variation = natural variability If have provided some refs for most of the historical details. If you'd like more References/Info let me know. Enjoy :-) See this pdf with Youtube vids / websites that relates to the content and context of this JM article, the IPA, and climate science. See: Thomas O'Reilly Useful Links http://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-M0yAR0UPhPd2prNmVhU3B3bEE Why is it such a prickly subject? Remember, Nature bats last! :-) Posted by Thomas O'Reilly, Saturday, 27 August 2016 5:55:50 PM
| |
Climate Feedback is an excellent fairly new website operated by climate scientists and academics to counter and correct misinformation - disinformation in the media and online.
Today’s media climate leads to confusion With so much information available online, trying to figure out which information is credible — and what is not — is a real challenge. When so much of what we read falls outside of our own expertise, how can we know which headlines and news articles are consistent with science? http://climatefeedback.org Addendum from previous comments in pdf about John Abbot and his so-called "Papers" in "scientific journals" as displayed and promoted by Marohasy on her and on their ClimateLab websites. About Wessex Institute of Technology: Wessex Institute of Technology is a big Scam and their conferences are ... ..... Wessex Institute is a big money making machine for Mr Brebbia by offering very ... Dubious conference invitations. Just spam, or do these meetings ... https://www.researchgate.net/.../Dubious_conference_invitations_Just_spam_or_do_th... Jul 9, 2013 - These bogus and predatory conference invitations are becoming just ... I'd say that I get such mails for both journals and conferences on a ... may i ask you about the case of Wessex Institute of Technology(WIT)?do you have ... List of Bogus Journals. Fake Journals. Bogus Science ie Pseudoscience Wessex Institute of Technology · REF: http://www.google.com.au/#q=%22Wessex+institute%22+journal+bogus%3F&gws_rd=cr LOL - doesn't surprise me one little bit. Intelligent and wise people always check the purported 'facts' It really helps to expose amateurs, sophists, liars, frauds and the lazy. Allow me to repeat my opening comment about this article by Marohasy: "Jennifer Marohasy, this 'article' is a very trashy, disjointed, false, fraudulent and manipulative piece of work." Followed up with: "Jennifer, your article is an insult to people's intelligence." Thanks very much to Graham and OLO allowing me to express my sincere opinions and share some additional info for readers without any censorship. Much appreciated. Nothing has motivated me to adjust my opinions, as yet Posted by Thomas O'Reilly, Saturday, 27 August 2016 6:52:57 PM
| |
Thomas O’Reilly, you produce a lot of words, but no substance. You attack an honest and competent scientist, like Jennifer Moahasy, while being a supporter, yourself, of the climate fraud, for which there is no supporting science. You have given no reference to science which shows any measurable human effect on climate.
If you can refer us to any such science, then please do so. If not then you have no basis for support of the assertion that human emissions have any measurable effect on climate. Because you have no science to support your position, you have no science to refute Jennifer Morahasy, so you employ the fraud-backers approach of a baseless, and dishonest attack on her. You have no science to support your position, and whatever you have put forward has been based on the false and baseless assumption that any global warming is human caused Posted by Leo Lane, Saturday, 27 August 2016 7:59:04 PM
| |
@Armchair Critic: "Tell me we mostly all live by the coast; has anyone noticed the location of the sea change in their lifetimes?"
In psychology, Cognitive Dissonance is the mental stress or discomfort experienced by an individual who holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values at the same time. http://skepdic.com/cognitivedissonance.html Do NOT View Images: http://goo.gl/DoKiiv Do NOT Read Text: Researchers Call For A National Coastline Observatory in Australia http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2016/04/23/researchers-call-for-a-national-coastline-observatory-in-austral/ IT’S the Australian dream — a multi-million-dollar beachfront house on a stretch of pristine coastline. http://www.news.com.au/national/is-the-australian-dream-of-a-beachfront-home-really-worth-it/news-story/37842853b935d2e78faa4d4f7deb2ff2 Coastal engineers waiting for Collaroy residents to have storm-damaged houses cleared http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-16/engineers-waiting-for-collaroy-residents-to-have-houses-cleared/7516184 Beach shacks falling into the sea SA http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-26/point-turton-shacks-storm-damage-ugent-repairs/7788284 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-26/tathra-wharf-insurance-payout-denied/7788162 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-17/storm-hits-perth-with-high-winds-rain/7750806 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-14/storms-steal-a-slice-of-south-east-coastline-and-part-of-jetty/7630370 http://www.goldcoastbulletin.com.au/lifestyle/beaches-and-fishing/gold-coast-at-threat-of-severe-erosion-and-property-damage-research-shows/news-story/46326698783e430830f4e668b0086191 Areas that will be most affected by rising sea levels http://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/climate-change/maps-show-areas-that-will-be-most-affected-by-rising-sea-levels/news-story/57d33f3fdf52a6baf9491ffcd4f1a570 154 Australian scientists demand climate policy that matches THE Science “governments worldwide are presiding over a large-scale demise of the planetary ecosystems, which threatens to leave large parts of Earth uninhabitable” and asks for “meaningful reductions” in greenhouse gas emissions and cuts to coal exports. Coral reefs supported 500 million people worldwide but reefs were “threatened with complete collapse” 25% marine species were at risk, exposing “hundreds of millions of people to decreasing food security and increased poverty”. http://theconversation.com/154-australian-scientists-demand-climate-policy-that-matches-the-science-64359 and http://www.theguardian.com/environment/planet-oz/2016/aug/25/climate-scientists-write-another-open-letter-warning-of-unfolding-crisis-for-prime-minister-malcolm-turnbull-to-ignore Look what has been happening lately around Australia's coastline alone. Queensland, more than nine-tenths of the Great Barrier Reef has just been bleached. Perhaps a quarter of it has died and likely won't come back. The Gulf—the worst mass die-off of mangroves ever seen, 10,000 hectares along the coast. Look off Western Australia—960 square kilometres of kelp forest has just disappeared. More than 33% is now extinct. And all of this in just the past six months! To be bluntly colloquial, it's very bloody real, it's right bloody here, right bloody now. http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/scienceshow/what-will-it-take-for-us-to-pay-attention-to-climate-change/7749086 Bloody Socialist Leftist Media! 70% of Republican Senators reject the scientific consensus of AGW/CC Senate Leadership Fund is a Super PAC to maintain Republican majority. Duke Energy contribution $150,000 Chevron has contributed $2 million. Petrodome Energy donated $1 million. Devon Energy donated $750,000. CEO of Freeport LNG contributed $500,000. NextEra Energy contributed $250,000. http://www.facingsouth.org/2016/08/duke-energy-invests-keeping-climate-science-rejecting-us-senate Posted by Thomas O'Reilly, Saturday, 27 August 2016 8:34:58 PM
| |
Thomas O'Reilly Both Flannery and Karoly have beachfront properties and you are telling me (and I presume them, or perhaps they are telling you?) that all this will end in tears.
Need I go on? I mean, really, mate! Posted by JBowyer, Saturday, 27 August 2016 9:05:34 PM
|
According to the Saturday paper it has been hijacked by radical ideologues. We know that radical ideology is not a good mix with science.
https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/politics/2016/08/27/former-ipa-head-radicals-hijacked-think-tank/14722200003666?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The+Saturday+Briefing+123&utm_content=The+Saturday+Briefing+123+CID_5552cba2ce698ff0aa0fd6e6f0a4e5a1&utm_source=EDM&utm_term=Mike+Seccombe