The Forum > Article Comments > Proposed indefinite detention laws in Australia > Comments
Proposed indefinite detention laws in Australia : Comments
By Binoy Kampmark, published 9/8/2016The Turnbull government has come down rather heavily in its response to a spate of attacks in France and Germany, deciding that it is time that something be done in the face of this supposed global madness.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
Philip S this is incorrect and thus misleading about Australia's judicial system,
"Under Australia’s Constitution, our judiciary is independent from the other arms of government. The separation of powers doctrine means that in interpreting and applying the law, judicial officers act independently and without interference from the parliament or the executive. The constitutional guarantees of tenure and remuneration assist in securing judicial independence."
> https://www.ag.gov.au/LegalSystem/Courts/Pages/default.aspx
Judges in Australia have to issue detailed statements called "Judgements" in finalising a matter. These can be examined by both sides in the case once they are handed down and potentially challenged in a higher court.
Some of the judgements handed down by the Federal court can be read online here > http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/publications/judgments/latest
The exception to that would be matters in the High court. Their is no High court of appeal, the decisions are final.