The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Castration and hate crime legislation: a model to avoid in Australia > Comments

Castration and hate crime legislation: a model to avoid in Australia : Comments

By Alexandra Tennant, published 15/4/2016

Think twice before 'treating' child sex offenders with chemical castration.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All
You do all this from your mobility scooter do you? You are a very sick old man.
Posted by ttbn, Saturday, 16 April 2016 10:38:58 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Nope JOM, you don’t have to rape to achieve sexual satisfaction. You do not even have to have sex in order to achieve it. There must be something else that rapists and child abusers are seeking.

People have sex for all sorts of reasons other than sexual satisfaction. Some are more benign than others but the percentage of sexual couplings that are simply about sexual satisfaction is fairly small in my opinion.
Posted by phanto, Saturday, 16 April 2016 3:56:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Someone should've put a bullet into him in 93.
And I mean the government.
Bring back the death penalty.

I'm pretty sure a pattern of behaviour was established after the second offense.
And even though he served his time, I don't think there was any reason to think that innocent kids weren't being put at risk from his release.
I think any reasonable person would have had reason to think he might re-offend.
Should tax payers be forced to waste 1 cent on someone who has a history of being predator to innocent kids and who may never be able to be trusted in society?
Posted by Armchair Critic, Sunday, 17 April 2016 9:19:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
We are soft of paedophiles because there are many of them in the upper echelons of our society including our Judiciary. Jimmy Savile and Rolph Harris had close contacts with the Royals for decades. Rumours must have abounded.

I'm more concerned about our Govts giving our police too many powers. http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/apr/14/police-powers-prevention-orders-could-set-up-rival-justice-system-in-nsw?CMP=Share_iOSApp_ Under the ruse of terrorism and paedophila, new laws can be used against innocent people. The laws are adequate but the Judiciary won't implement them.
Posted by Arjay, Sunday, 17 April 2016 10:39:45 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ttbn: Mobility scooters come in all shapes and sizes some even have tracks and can cope with some very difficult terrain. And then act as a blind when it comes to vermin eradication.

You lose any ability to engage in conclusive moral argument, when your limit is just to bag folks, in fact I believe you've reached your bag limit sport!

I'm very much against violence and violent people!

Not once have you used persuasive argument to support your assertions, you just start with a utterly feeble attempt at character assassination and exclusively reliant on your misrepresentations of other folk and their motivations.

Go the verbal sport, cause that's all you've got!

You all have a nice day now, y'hear.
Rhrosty.
Posted by Rhrosty, Sunday, 17 April 2016 10:49:59 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Rhrosty,

How about drive-by shootings? Are the geriatric scooters quick enough for a getaway? As for your cutting a string on a bottle at 300 yards, you couldn't see the string. It's the bottle you are supposed to hit. I used to shoot 7.62mm from 300m to 900mm, and know what is possible and what is not. .303 before that, along with .22 pistol rapid fire and 50 metre. Your 'shooting' experience comes from John Wayne movies in whatever care institution you live in.
Posted by ttbn, Sunday, 17 April 2016 11:41:58 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy