Yes, flea, the point is that if I truthfully describe your behaviour, you will react by untruthfully categorizing what I say as “aggression” and “abuse”. If anything I have said is not true, if you can point to where you have responded to questions or posted something relevant to the topic, then do so, instead of dishonestly whining about non- existent “abuse”. It is your problem if your behaviour is so bad that a description of it reads like abuse. Learn to conduct yourself like a reasonable, honest human being and refer us to science which shows a measurable human effect on climate, or stop backing climate fraud.
The science which I have posted is not outdated, you are simply lying again. There is no science to show a measurable human effect on climate.

Leo

I invite readers to peruse your profile and mine, then they can assess from our comments which one of us is being aggressive.
I'd also invite readers to go to references I have provided.

But, the climate is changing; whether man created or otherwise, and we need to do something about it.

Thanks for saving me the effort, ant.

Leo, you are one angry and abusive little man, aren't you. It seems you adopt a lot of bluff and bluster in lieu of any evidence for your politically-driven beliefs.

Good bye.

The village idiot, AJPhillips, has made one last visit to the Forum, to support the flea.
AJ disappeared for a lengthy period after I asked him for a reference to science which showed any measurable human effect on climate.
His answer was that I had asked a “dishonest question”, earning himself the title of “village idiot”, before he disappeared. Like all the flea’s supporters, AJ will now disappear, and we will have a further reduction of one fraud supporting troll, and no one here tosupport the flea's dishonest nonsense. Where is the science to show any measurable human effect on climate, flea?

Where exactly did I say that, Leo?

<<His answer was that I had asked a “dishonest question”...>>

I'm not saying that I didn't, I just can't find it.

You wouldn't be... lying, now.... Would you? Because that would be so-o-o-o out of character for you, wouldn't it.

You seem to have ditched your "evidence" regarding the Carboniferous period pretty quickly now, I notice, and have resorted again to hurling abuse and insults.

As a fellow practitioner of the law, I hope you don't argue like this in court. I'd have you for breakfast.

Dear AJ Phillips,

Forgive me but I'm going to slightly disagree with you, I feel he actually believes what he is spouting.

Perhaps humouring him would be the kindest path for us all. To this end we should recognise his fondness for doling out nicknames and recognise he probably expects one in return.

As I am sure he is less a lying Leo Lane than a loopy Leo Lane, which has a definite ring to it, 'Loopy Leo', or 'Loopy' to his friends like us seems to be appropriate.

I feel this kind of recognition would most certainly scratch the attention deficit itch he constantly exhibits, leaving happier souls all round.