Leo

You use abuse and semantics to push your opinion, you are no arbiter of what comprises science.

Earlier in the year there were unprecedented bush fires in Tasmania; now, almost unbelievably wild fires have struck Northern areas of Canadia on 18 April 2016. The Fort St.John region has been hit; evacuations of people had to occur in some areas. Temperature have been extraordinarily high for their winter period.

References:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/fort-st-john-wildfire-1.3541983

http://www.alaskahighwaynews.ca/regional-news/evacuation-orders-rescinded-for-baldonnel-and-taylor-but-alerts-remain-in-effect-1.2235382

Last year fires were a major issue in Canada and Alaska, a report dated 11 July discusses the early nature of the fire season in 2015.

http://www.npr.org/2015/07/11/421995880/wildfires-in-canada-and-alaska-drive-thousands-from-homes

The question is Leo, what should we be doing to adapt to climate change?
Whether man created or natural climate variation is a secondary consideration.

The flea’s reference to my clear and unequivocal statements as semantics simply demonstrates his addle-brained outlook.
His science is irrelevant, because if he posted anything relevant it would immediately show his assertions to be unsupported by science.
There is no science to show any measurable human effect on climate, is there, flea?
His uncivil response is invariably to ignore the question, and post irrelevant material, or none at all. Sometimes he employs the fraud promoter’s technique of answering a sensible question with a stupid question, but he has no science to support his assertion of human caused global warming.
He believes that using the term “semantics” makes him appear knowledgeable, while it simply confirms that he is an unresponsive ignoramus, with no tertiary qualification, and little education. He is incapable of a rational response, and refers to truthful statements about his incivility and misconduct, as "abuse"

I notice that the village idiot, A J Phillips sourced Skeptical Science from a google search of the headline of this article.
Are you attempting to promote this scurrilous misinformation site, AJP? As you would be aware, it is run by an unqualified cartoonist
http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2015/06/sss-myth-creator-john-cook.html
A better reference from the search was:
“Earth experienced an ice age 450 million years ago, with CO2 somewhere between 2000 and 8000 ppm. According to Hansen’s theories – all life on Earth should have been extinct before it even evolved.”
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/05/31/ice-age-at-2000-ppm-co2/

The CO2 hypothesis has failed, but the fraudies still want to promote it, despite there being no science to show any measurable human effect on climate.
A better reference from the search was:
“Earth experienced an ice age 450 million years ago, with CO2 somewhere between 2000 and 8000 ppm. According to Hansen’s theories – all life on Earth should have been extinct before it even evolved.”
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/05/31/ice-age-at-2000-ppm-co2/

Leo

Thank you for once again proving my point.

You have a point, flea?

Not one that I have ever noticed.

With your addle brained output, it would be like a needle in a haystack.

Yes, Leo, I have a point , you keep using aggression, it is a logical fallacy.
The few references you use stem from blogs or science papers long since superceded. Readers are able to access our previous comments in relation to previous articles so they can make up their minds. Many of the references I have provided relate to recently published science papers; the problem for contrarians is that very few papers are published in major science journals by skeptical climate scientists.

The non-science you refer to that I present has a trail to AAAS, Wiley, NASA, or Universities. At times film clips of scientists being interviewed has been provided. Many of the newspaper articles presented have hyperlinks to the science papers being discussed; while other newspaper articles refer to incredible events such as the wild fires at Fort St. John which have just occurred. Last year there were major fires in Alaska in June, and they were said to be early.
Prior to the Alaskan fires there had been fires that killed people in Siberia; though they had been set fires used for agricultural purposes that had become uncontrollable.

Infra-structure has already been impacted on; billions of dollars have been lost in damage from major events, people have been killed.

Whether caused by man or otherwise, damage is being done.
Planning needs to be progressing to adapt and mitigate against the climate change that is happening