The Forum > Article Comments > Australia Day: the least we can do is accept our own history > Comments
Australia Day: the least we can do is accept our own history : Comments
By Andrew Bartlett, published 25/1/2016The fact Stan Grant’s compelling speech has gone viral shows just how deeply this refusal to accept the reality of Australia’s history resonates with so many people.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
-
- All
Wow, I haven't heard or read that term 'full-blood' except in its contextualised form, for quite some time.
If you know anything about Aboriginal people in the 'South', you would know that 'full-bloods' are pretty thin on the ground. I reckon there are more than people might think, out in the rural areas, but the vast majority, while they would have very few non-Aboriginal birth-relations that they knew actively, would overwhelmingly have non-Aboriginal ancestry going back nearly two hundred years.
Since you are interested, my wife's ancestry would have been similarly mixed, and amongst her great-great-grandparents would have been English, Scots, Chinese and Italian. She could trace her Aboriginal ancestry easily back to the 1830s, perhaps even the 1820s, (Aboriginal people are far better documented than people think), back to a half a dozen of those gr-gr-grandparents, mostly Ngarrindjeri (in fact, mostly from the Jaralde dialect group of the Ngarrindjeri (Narrung Peninsula, Lakes), and at least one from the Ramindjeri dialect group of the Ngarrindjeri (South Coast)), with one Narrunga gr-gr-grandparent as well, from northern Yorke Peninsula here n SA. In terms you seem to be familiar with, you would have been classed her as 'quadroon'. So to continue in the same vein, I guess you would call my kids 'octoroons'. We called them 'kids', 'people', vibrant human beings like other Aboriginal people of all manner of fractionations.
Having got that out of the way, to LEGO's comments: no, I don't see much wrong with them. I'll check again. Nope, sound good to me.
Joe