The Forum > Article Comments > Israel's occupation is morally indefensible > Comments
Israel's occupation is morally indefensible : Comments
By Alon Ben-Meir, published 17/12/2015There are four ethical theories - Kantian, utilitarian, virtue-based, and religious - that demonstrate the lack of moral foundation in the continuing occupation.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
I also could not care less about the so-called "Palestinians" (if they even exist), nor do I believe that Alon does.
The point here is, if you steal - you become a thief; if you kill - you become a murderer; if you rape - you become a rapist, etc. Anyone who truly loves Israel doesn't want it to become the like of those.
Regarding the Aristotelian theory of morality, the safety of the people of Israel is in fact hampered by the occupation, not helped by it. Alon touched on this already: large forces of the IDF are occupied in patrolling the West-Bank and in road-blocks there in order to protect the settlers. Those forces lose in six ways: loss of training; loss of blood; loss of equipment due to wear and damages and no budget left for new equipment; loss of international support; loss of morals; and loss of morale. In turn, the loss of morals, as the soldiers return home, increases the crime-rate within Israel, including reckless-driving and domestic-violence and further reduces the safety of the people of Israel. It also tears the Israeli society apart.
Israelis would be safer without the West Bank, when if attacked they can respond swiftly and decisively, better trained, equipped, unrestrained, resolute and confident, without international opposition and without having to worry about civilian casualties.
Regarding the LEGO theory of morality, why don't you serve your interests yourself rather than throw all the dirty work on the Jews?