Mr Opinion, Andrew Bolt's blog & Alan Jones talk back show have been attacking our dead beat ANTI-education industry for months now. The 2 most popular journalists in the land of OZ. I move in a wide variety of social circles & i have not met a single person with anything good to say about our ANTI-education system. So if you think my opinion is wrong it is shared by 60% to 90% of the population & this is supposed to be a democracy.

mhaze, if i was a woman in the desert in Saudia Arabia during a sand storm i would want to be wearing a cotton burqa. if i was a man in an oil Sheikdom like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait or Bahrain & my wife or daughters were attractive i would want them wearing a burqa BECAUSE i love them, for fear that the local Sheik might steal them for his harem. it is simple common sense realism. The facts of islam are horrific enough already, by making up extra stuff we make ourselves look paranoid.

Dan S de Merengue, you will change your tune after being charged with treason.

Imacentristmoderate,

The wearing of the burga I read, was ordered by Muhammed to protect women
From all the rapes that were occurring. It was the same old blame the victim
Instead of the perpetrator.

There is no reason for the burqa to be worn in Australia or Europe today.

And you are right it is about men keeping control of their women by hiding them from other men. The men however don't mind going out flirting with other women.

Women don't need marriage they always know who their children are.

Men need to keep women away from other men to know who their children are.

So the wearing of the burqa is a form of control over womens freedom to choose other partners.

Women really have no need of the burqa in any deep and meaningful way from
The female perspective.
They could have a pick of the best men to father each of their children to give them the best advantage of various strong genetic traits.

The same reason men seek multiple wives really.
Men want to have everything their own way.
Women are really better off and happier without marriage and the control of one man.
Something men just can't admit to themselves

Since when is speaking a language other than English treasonous?

Wal wen detlot pipul bin irrim im tok garram det langgus, deibin ol jidan brabli kwait.

CHERFUL, The wearing of the burga was ordered by Muhammed to protect muslim women. Using rape against non muslim women was part of their terror campaign, especially before or after beheading the husband. But be careful what you read, a lot of academics & media people lie to promote their agenda. Accurate information can be had simply by reading the Quran in chronological order. Reading Sirah (which is easy enough) & Hadith (which is encyclopaedic) or trusting the opinion of Christian cleric who has.

Of course except it is now part of their culture & multi-CULT-uralism was introduced by Trotskyists in 1972.

The men however don't mind going out flirting with other women. Also true when your not talking about enlightened, conservative, protesting Christian men.

Women don't need marriage they always know who their children are. Really, i recently met a rescued baby whose birth certificate had changed 3 times until the DNA came in with a winner. femi-NAZISM trains women to do dangerous things, then blame men for their self inflicted injuries.

Men need to keep women away from other men to know who their children are, true, if the women are not enlightened, conservative, protesting Christians.

So the wearing of the burqa is a form of control over women's freedom to choose other partners. NO, they suited the desert & protecting women from both rape & slavery in the harem.

Women really have no need of the burqa in any deep and meaningful way from, any perspective, true.

They could have a pick of the best men to father each of their children to give them the best advantage of various strong genetic traits, if they want to abuse their children, yes.

The same reason men usually prefer to pick one good women & be faithful to her really. Women want to have everything their own way. Children are really better off and happier with a good marriage and the control of BOTH biological parents. Something femi-NAZI women just can't admit to themselves.

Dan S de Merengue, aiding & abbeting islamic terrorism is.

Speaking in a language other than English is aiding and abetting Islamic terrorism? Please explain.

Speaking in a language other than English is something a healthy percentage of Australians do everyday.

I surprised by such alarmist xenophobia coming from you. If it was coming from Phil Dye, then it might be more understandable.
(Phil Dye - "If the dominant population of English speakers can't understand what is being said by a group who are not just over-represented in crime statistics but solely represented in terrorism news, then our first response is to mistrust it.")

Dan S de Merengue, YOU are an ANTI-socialist who has been supporting islamic migration & therefore ALSO supporting islamic terrorism. That is clearly "aiding & abetting" terrorism. One day in the not too distant future a conservative government will have enough backbone to charge & convict you.