The Forum > Article Comments > Why we should reject the CSIRO's 'sustainable' growth scenario > Comments
Why we should reject the CSIRO's 'sustainable' growth scenario : Comments
By Jonathan Rutherford, published 17/11/2015Can the world almost triple GDP by 2050 and increase affluent 'living standards', while at the same time significantly reducing environmental impacts?
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
"For example, a recent peer reviewed paper estimating ultimately recoverable resources of fossil fuel resources, including unconventional, found that total fossil fuel supplies are likely to peak around 2025, with the only uncertainty being how fast they decline thereafter."
Then I tried looking at the paper. I'm not paying $37 for nonsense but the idea of a fossil fuel peak has been debunked so often that I don't think there is any need to look at it. The peak oil story is passed its use by date and, in any case, only ever applied to easy-lift oil (oil in conventional reservoirs), not total oil supplies.
As for a coal peak Bwwwwhahahaha! With coal prices having collapsed you should tell that to the coal industry people. They need a good laugh. However, I'm confused over whether this article refers to a production peak (certainly possible in the near term) with an actual supply peak (completely impossible).
The rest of the article is not worth critiquing.