Since he first infested the pages of OLO as a determined climate fraud supporter ant has been asked, more than once, to refer us to science showing any measurable effect of human emissions on climate. He has failed to do so because there is no such science, a fact of which he must now be aware.
Not surprising when human emissions contribute three per cent of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, against 97% by nature. The human effect is trivial, and not measurable.
Support for the climate fraud can only be based on ignorance or dishonesty. Since ant cannot plead ignorance, his support of the fraudulent assertion of human caused global warming can only be based on dishonesty.
He has disqualified himself from participation in rational interaction on the topic, by his refusal to make any rational assertion. He should be disregarded

Leo, the scientists from ExxonMobil in the 1970s and 80s wrote and talked human created climate change. ExxonMobil even did cost analysis of drilling in the Beaufort Sea on the basis of sea ice disappearing. When a major fossil fuel company has agreed that human created climate change exists it pulls the rug from under you doesn't it; Leo, I can understand you're upset.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14527-climate-myths-global-warming-stopped-in-1998/

http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-stopped-in-1998.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period

http://www.skepticalscience.com/greenland-used-to-be-green.htm

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11644-climate-myths-it-was-warmer-during-the-medieval-period-with-vineyards-in-england/

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11646-climate-myths-the-hockey-stick-graph-has-been-proven-wrong/

Leo Lane: “Since he first infested the pages of OLO as a determined climate fraud supporter ant has been asked, more than once, to refer us to science showing any measurable effect of human emissions on climate. He has failed to do so because there is no such science, a fact of which he must now be aware. …

He has disqualified himself from participation in rational interaction on the topic, by his refusal to make any rational assertion. He should be disregarded.”

Well said. He shall be disregarded.

Hey ant,
Noticed that the http://insideclimatenews.org organisation was founded by the Rockefellers.

Are they paying you to promote their agenda?
If not they should be, because you're putting a lot of effort into it.

Oh, and just in case you aren't smart enough to make the connection.
Rockefeller = Standard Oil Company = Exxon and Mobil.

Dear Raycom,

You wrote;

“Despite a sustained production of anthropogenic greenhouse gases, there has been no statistically significant global warming for the last 18 or so years.”

Bulldust.

Show me what data you have used to make this extraordinary claim.