The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The deconstruction of gender > Comments

The deconstruction of gender : Comments

By Babette Francis, published 29/9/2015

The title of my paper is 'The Deconstruction of Gender', but it is really about the deconstruction of reality and what is bordering on a collective insanity.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. All
Suseonline:

“You can't be born a polygamist!”

How do you know this? How do you know that you are born a homosexual? You can’t be sure you are a homosexual until you reach sexual maturity and you may not discover you are attracted to polygamy until you begin to think about marriage.

Why doesn’t the same awareness dawn on someone about their orientation towards polygamy as it does to homosexuality or heterosexuality?
Posted by phanto, Wednesday, 30 September 2015 2:39:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Nobody is truly godless.

Some people centre their life and define themselves around sex without realising that they do so because they just worship different gods - their genes. When those genes say "hop", they ask "how high?", when they say "procreate" they fill up the earth with progeny even when they cannot support it; and when the genes say "F--K", they go to any length to obey and do this with whomever the genes command them to be attracted to, deluding themselves as if it's their own free will. Then as their gods are jealous and want no competition, those people are impelled to fight religion (including those among them who falsely consider themselves "religious" and identify with a corresponding group/organisation, even accepting its beliefs).

It matters not whether one defines themselves by the original 2 genders or by the newer 58 - both make the same mistake of worshipping the genetic idols.

It is those same genes that seduce us toward material "progress" (i.e. their own success), including the promotion of the science that is required for that end.

An honest look will reveal the sexual urge lurking behind this desire for human progress. Religion counteracts this wild urge.

I therefore thank you, Doog, for raising this point. I basically agree with your analysis and as a religious person I would proudly stifle this gene-induced progression and ignore the science that comes with it. I call on all religious people to do the same.
Posted by Yuyutsu, Wednesday, 30 September 2015 3:21:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I think that if this is where democratic government is leading then before long democracy will be replaced by dictatorship. It is a colossal waste of public money to push these issues. Even without this nonsense most western governments are seriously dysfunctional.
Posted by Gadfly42, Wednesday, 30 September 2015 10:06:23 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Susieonline

You're contradicting yourself. Tell you what. You go away and actually *think* through your confusion over everything you're talking about, and when you're ready to rejoin the discussion with something other that circular biased slogans, come back and say something sensible and *non*-contradictory.

In the meantime, try to control your bigoted hateful belief that it's okay to have people caged and raped for private consensual sexual relations that are none of your business.
Posted by Jardine K. Jardine, Friday, 2 October 2015 9:30:15 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
is feminism a mental illness?

do Sontag, Greer & Friedan display symptoms of PTSD, BPD or PNPD?
Posted by imacentristmoderate, Monday, 5 October 2015 6:44:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I've noticed a few people have enquired as to why all of a sudden has Governments started to push the Gender issues generally especially the Transgender and Gay communities.
This is not a hard question to answer. First you must look at endocrine disrupting chemicals. The vast array of these headed by BPA are all oestrogenic in nature. They are so entrenched in the environment that there is no avoiding a dose. The size of the dose is irrelevant, the smallest amount has a profound effect.
When males are exposed the body assumes that too much androgen has been made and reduces the androgen load by making SHBG. Thus reducing testosterone and leaving exogenous estrogen unchanged. Males become more female. With females same process only as testosterone has lower starting levels females hits testosterone crisis. Thus testosterone hits maximum production. Females become more male.
This also effects foetal development.
In the 60s it was estimated the transgenders and Gays generally made up 7-10% of the population. Today that is about 15-20%.
Just look around. Observation is one of the most basic scientific paradigms. I've also read some 200 peer reviewed papers on the subject. Happy to share.
Posted by JustGiveMeALLTheFacts, Tuesday, 6 October 2015 12:51:17 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy