Gawd there are some prats on this site.

Craig by your reply you are also one of them, opinions are opinions, yours being as ridiculous as any one else

Thinkabit:

How can you have a logical argument based on a false premise? If it has a false premise then it is illogical. You can't just skip bits of the process. The premise of religious people cannot be proven and until it can then they have no argument. If they are not truly arguing then what else can they be doing but rationalising?

Craig Minns is absolutely correct (possibly for the first time in his life) there are a lot of "prats" on this thread. That includes himself, and all of the other self loathing, western hating, apologists for Islam.

Susieoncrack claims that you can't blame Islam or religion for violence. Violence is all the fault of "humans." Gee, you could have some fun with that logic. The Nazis did not gas the Jews, "humans" did it. What about Onjab's little fantasy about the USA wanting to destroy China? Nup, Onjab. It is not the USA, it is "humans" who want to destroy China. Humans are all equally guilty of violence. Mother Theresa is as bad as Ghengis Ghan. The Quakers are just as bad as ISIS. Susie's mindset is indicative of just how creative people can be when they are determined to not understand a simple truth.

Phanto claims it is "simplistic" to link Islam to violence. You are right there, Phanto. It is very simple to make the connection that there is a link between Islam and somebody cutting off an aid workers head while screaming "Allah Akbar". But if you are absolutely determined not to make a screamingly obvious connection, then no amount of reasoned logic can ever permeate through your overly thick skull.

Onjab first tries a red herring. He moans about the USA surrounding China with bases. The yanks and Tony Abbot are Christians who Onjab has convinced himself want to wipe out China, therefore we are as bad as ISIS. Then he tries moral equivalence. ISIS uses violence to get what they want and so do Christians. That is the moral equivalence. That is like saying that the local policeman is just as bad as Ivan Milat because they both use violence. Although, that is probably exactly what Onjab believes. Then he says that ISIS must be OK, because well gee, everybody hated Imperial Japan but now we all drive Toyotas and Subaru's so give it time and we will all love ISIS.

Brilliant logic.

The prosecution rests...

Lego perhaps in fifty years time we will have the Isis electric car, the Allah electric car etc, all this business of beheadings will have stopped by then, remember the cruelty of the Japanese means nothing now, why did my cousin die then so you could drive around in your lovely Japanese Toyota car, I am sure he would give you hugs & kisses just for buying one now if he was to pop back.
No wonder the world is in such a mess when people on OLO cannot agree on anything.
Have a lovely day Legp