The Forum > Article Comments > Is Chérif Kouachi a classic case of prison radicalisation? > Comments
Is Chérif Kouachi a classic case of prison radicalisation? : Comments
By Romain Quivooij, published 23/1/2015Between 2005 and 2006, Chérif Kouachi, one of the two Charlie Hebdo attackers, was imprisoned in the Fleury-Mérogis jail. While this appears to have facilitated his behavioural transition to violent extremism, it did not constitute a 'triggering event'.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
Posted by Rhrosty, Saturday, 24 January 2015 11:59:26 AM
| |
There is a way to get rid of them even if born here.
First just put them on an air force aircraft, land it somewhere in Syria and kick them out the door without a passport. Second, face facts and declare war on ISIS and repatriate them as enemy prisoners of war. The 1st is illegal of course, but governments do illegal things in extremis. 2nd is a neat legal trick, but as ISIS is pleased to acknowledge that it has establish a legal state with a formal government and has promoted action against Australia, it looks like war to me. Posted by Bazz, Saturday, 24 January 2015 2:28:56 PM
| |
See the clip that was censored by MSM. This is the cop that was reportedly executed by these alleged terrorists. There is no blood on the pavement, no gun recoil, no head injuries and the shot completely misses the target. This gun appears to be loaded with blanks.
The gunmen flee the scene leaving their ID in their escape car.They cannot be that stupid. This is like 911 when terrorist passports survived an inferno that burnt bodies to a crisp. http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charlie-hebdo-shootings-censored-video I suggest there are reasons for this attack is to bring France in line. France wants to recognise Palestine. France like Germany wants to leave the Euro. France also owes Russia two war ships that are no ready for delivery. Posted by Arjay, Sunday, 25 January 2015 9:02:25 AM
| |
France wants to leave the EU, you must be kidding Arjay.
Without the EU farm subsidies, French farmers would not live a comfortable affluent life, milking just 6 cows. They might need 150 cows like our dairy blokes. With French farmers tendency to burn down everything in sight, when not featherbedded with other peoples money, they may find their Muslims are less trouble than their farmers, if the handouts were to stop. Posted by Hasbeen, Sunday, 25 January 2015 10:08:21 AM
| |
Hasbeen I'm talking about the EU currency not trade. Switzerland left the Euro and their currency rose by 30% in one day. The Bank of International Settlements has its base there and the Central Banksters know what's coming. They are going to print the Euro into oblivion and steal via inflation yet again while they are safe in a Swiss Franc.
Posted by Arjay, Sunday, 25 January 2015 3:13:49 PM
| |
Arjay, "There is no blood on the pavement, no gun recoil, no head injuries and the shot completely misses the target. This gun appears to be loaded with blanks"
Sorry, but that was discussed at length and debunked in another thread. You may not have seen all of it. Just to pick up a few obvious problems: - no apparent blood is consistent with the full metal jacket rounds that would have been used; - a gas-loading rifle has little apparent recoil to the onlooker and even less would have been noticed where it was not fired at the shoulder. The load for that rifle is mild but unfortunately quite effective; - the puff of dust off the sidewalk is consistent with normal 'ball' ammunition. It is the remainder of the gas exiting the barrel after firing and exiting of the projectile it was driving; and, - blanks would have required a threaded blocking cap on the end of the barrel to permit the gas-operated mechanism to work to remove the spent cartridge and load and cock for the next. They stand out as a large round item on the end of the barrel. However no blocking cap is noticeable. The details of the photo are consistent with the reported use. Posted by onthebeach, Sunday, 25 January 2015 10:43:29 PM
|
What choice did those innocents have, gunned down by hate!
Given that's the root cause of these cold blooded killings.
And if they are native born so what, when they can be offered a one way trip to Syria via a seemingly complicit Turkey, where they no doubt will feel completely at home and able to slake their blood lust to their heart's content; and on each other?
Just as long as they don't expect to be able to return, or a welcome mat in paradise, but rather eternal damnation.
Why on earth would we want them back or allow them to return?
Completely innocent (freedom fighters) for example, should be asked to return to Afghanistan, where trained; and to Taliban co-fighters. Ditto Syria!
And is there all that much difference in killing Australians over there supporting the peace process and or just wanting to, with every fibre of your being? Well?
And will this ever increasing volcano of hate eventually erupt in yet another massacre of entirely innocent civilians?
Send them back where they came from is hypothetical, given it's not possible.
But it is possible to offer them permanent exile, given they are incapable of living in peaceful harmony with anyone; let alone a Christian majority!
And given that is so, why should the vast peaceful majority be asked to tolerate them and their hate-filled hearts/murderous plans for a minute longer than necessary?
And we could start by reexamining some of those we've already allowed in, given their cover stories were never ever supported by any documentation or real evidence!
When some could just as easily be (chain smoking) Serb puppet masters masquerading as Bosnian, i.e., and living among them still, endlessly and cleverly stirred up discontent and trouble?
And profess outrage/racial discrimination, when questioned at our borders, regarding a recent return to Serbia, i.e?
And we could do worse than start to tear down racially specific ghettos, where much of this so called discontent is fomented!
Choice!? Bah humbug!
Rhrosty.