The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Ebola is not the only, or most dangerous, challenge we face > Comments

Ebola is not the only, or most dangerous, challenge we face : Comments

By Peter Curson, published 28/10/2014

So far 120,000 people have reported being infected but the real figure is probably closer to 200,000.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All
Thank you for this timely reminder as to the selectivity of what "crises" the western media chooses to focus on. Equally important in my view is what the media fails to discuss, and the Ebola outbreak is one of many such examples.

Why, for example, does the CDC in Atlanta hold a patent on the Ebola virus, and has done so for the past five years? The Patent Number is 20120251502A1. There are reports that the virus was developed in the biowarfare labs at Fort Dettrick among other places, and then "tested" in West Africa. These are certainly questions worth asking and the western media is conspicuously silent.

It is also curious that the major American response to the outbreak in West Africa is to send thousands of special forces troops, none of whom, as best one can ascertain, have any expertise in virus control. Perhaps again the real motives are somewhat different from the publicised ones.
Posted by James O'Neill, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 12:27:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The CDC holds a patent on the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola, which is not the strain going around at the moment. The reason the CDC applied for the patent was to forestall for-profit organisations patenting the gene sequence as Myriad Genetics did with the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Since the US Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that a patent could not be held solely on a gene sequence isolated from nature, the rationale for the CDC patent no longer exists. Indeed the Supreme Court ruling would invalidate the CDC patent.

The Western media is conspicuously silent about this, because it is a non-story. Only conspiracy theorists are interested in it.

The whole concept that Ebola virus is a man-made virus is ludicrous. The virus is endemic in fruit bat populations in Africa where it is largely asymptomatic http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7068/abs/438575a.html suggesting it has been present in fruit bats for thousands of generations.

The various forms of Ebola virus are also quite divergent, differing by up to 35% of the nucleotides http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.ppat.1000212#ppat-1000212-g001.
Posted by Agronomist, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 2:27:15 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
James do you wanna know who really killed Kennedy?
Posted by Cobber the hound, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 4:32:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Prof Francis Andrew Boyle is a lawyer who drafts the law for international agreements. In the clip below he reveals that Ebola has been genetically engineered with flu which he nick names Cobola.

Prof Boyle Drafted the legislation that makes it illegal to weaponise disease to kill humans. George Bush senior signed this into law in the early 1990's.Over 100 yrs ago Mayer Armchel Rothschild said," Give me control over a nations money and I care not who makes the laws."

http://www.infowars.com/bio-weapons-expert-ebola-outbreak-is-a-bio-weapon-release/

It is not just the disease that is the threat. The fear can kill far more. Just imagine our cities with people too fearful of riding on public transport to work. Our cities will not function.
Posted by Arjay, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 8:50:20 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Thanks Arjay,
I was about to mention the exact thing in regards to Prof Francis Boyle that you did.
So I'll have to take it one step further and post the link to the video and interview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5DOLQ6MN9g&list=UUvsye7V9psc-APX6wV1twLg

This articles topic 'Ebola is not the only, or most dangerous, challenge we face' is absolutely correct.
Because if you accept an experts opinion that Ebola is a bio-weapons release, then you have to ask why?
So I'll give you two more articles to look at.

http://fortune.com/2010/06/16/the-600-billion-challenge/
http://www.wnd.com/2009/05/99105/

In this current article Peter Curson has spoken about the threat of mosquito-borne infectious disease and the numbers are concerning, but after viewing the information contained in the links I've just added, I find the information in this following link even more concerning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmfbv-m7BlA

He speaks about 'inventing new vaccines and getting them out to all the children that need them.' and of 'cutting the number who die every year from about 9million to about half of that'.
But in the very next sentence he say the benefits include 'reducing the population growth'.

How does cutting the number of children who die every year (In an area of the world where Peter Curson in his last article mentioned 'youth-bulge') equate to reducing population growth?
Posted by Armchair Critic, Tuesday, 28 October 2014 10:42:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Please note the mindset of James O'Neill.

The Centre for Disease Control in the USA is an organisation dedicated to the identification of unknown human pathogens, and researching ways to counter these viruses and bacterium. The CDC was instrumental in eradicating smallpox, once the terror of the entire world. It came within an ace of destroying Malaria, the greatest remaining killer pathogen in existence. It routinely sends young and incredibly brave medical researchers into remote parts of the world to identify outbreaks of unknown diseases, collect samples, and identify the vectors. it was the CDC which first identified the Ebola virus, as well as Lassa Fever, the Marburg virus, and was only just beaten by the French Pasteur Institute in identifying AIDS. As such, it is an organisation to be praised to the rooftops. But if you have a total hatred of the USA like James, then even a sainted US organisation dedicated to preventing a new plague pandemic can be construed in your tiny and slightly potty mind to be something insidious.

I am sure that James did not come up with that all by himself. He probably read in some lefty publication somewhere that the CDC had patented the Ebola virus and his tiny mind made a few connections.

US government organisation---bad.
Ebola virus---bad
patenting the Ebola virus--bad.

Therefore, those wretched Americans are up to no good! The yanks must be up to no good because the Americans are always up to no good.

The world seems so simple to James. All he has to do is blame the USA for everything and he thinks that this displays his supposedly superior intelligence. I hope you learned something about your intelligence level on this one, James.

Thank you Agronamist for telling us the real reason why the CDC patented the virus. That is beyond James who chooses to go with his prejudices before he turns on his brain. If you think you are smart, James, start thinking smart. Read the book "The Coming Plague" and apologise to the CDC.
Posted by LEGO, Wednesday, 29 October 2014 3:12:09 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy