The Forum > Article Comments > Multicultural Australia: what does that mean under Conservative Government? > Comments
Multicultural Australia: what does that mean under Conservative Government? : Comments
By Jatinder Kaur, published 21/3/2014Today is the United Nations Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (21st March) and the 2014 theme is 'The Role of Leaders in Combating Racism and Racial Discrimination'.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
-
- All
Posted by individual, Monday, 24 March 2014 3:39:26 PM
| |
Banjo,
Yes, supporters of institutionalised multiculturalism or mass immigration usually resort to implicit or explicit accusations of racism in attempts to defend the ideologies or they just beg the question. I've never heard or read any defence of multiculturalism itself that doesn't include that type of sophistry. Some cultures are inimical to liberal democracy, no amount of propaganda will alter that fact. If those of us who reject institutionalised multiculturalism are racists then by the same logic so are 'multiculturalists' by virtue of their refusal to assimilate. Posted by mac, Monday, 24 March 2014 3:44:28 PM
| |
Multiculturalism at work in the UK,
http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterfliesandwheels/2014/03/breathtakingly-sexist/#more-12712 Posted by mac, Monday, 24 March 2014 3:52:02 PM
| |
Foxy "I can see that no matter what I say or write"
You don't say anything. All you do is copy and paste other people's words. "It's obvious that you refuse to acknowledge and see the contributions that immigrants have made to this country of ours." No, I question why they have to be non-Western/non-European/non-White immigrants, and why there have to be so many (especially since the GFC). Whites can contribute anything others can and more. Plus they are unlikely to disrupt the traditional social environment in any significant way. Fortress Australia? More like Minefield Australia. And the more crowded it gets, the more likely it will start exploding. Every nation in history had a "fortress" mentality. That's why they had armies to defend themselves. Only recent White "elites" (not "the people") have relinquished national self-interest for a naive all-together utopianism. That unlivable historical anomaly will not last much longer. Posted by Shockadelic, Monday, 24 March 2014 4:16:40 PM
| |
Dear Shocker,
This one's especially for you: http://www.news.com.au/national/inspiring-tale-of-former-refugee-dr-munjed-al-muderis-and-war-hero-michael-swain-fncynjr2-1226849124080 Posted by Foxy, Monday, 24 March 2014 5:40:03 PM
| |
Foxy,
your link is no longer viewable it has been removed. Why not just tell us what it's all about ? Posted by individual, Tuesday, 25 March 2014 6:17:34 AM
|
that immigrants have made to this country
Foxy,
No-one argues against that in case you hadn't noticed. What the sensible people & those who care about the future of Australia are on about is not migrants, they're on about soldiers of religion hellbent on destroying this country & to think that there are leftist traitors having the audacity to call themselves Australian is simply no longer acceptable.
Treason is probably the most foul thing a resident of a country can come up with.