Steele, you really are a mess. You have still failed to supply any science to justify your fraud backing. Did it slip your clapped-out mind, again?

The words you represented as Obama’s, and now say are Bush’s, you said are true. I posted the words that Obama actually said, which were lies. Great own goal, Steele, you really outsmarted yourself. One of the few people that you are able to outsmart.

Thanks for your comment Graham Y, I acknowledge the problem with the article I quoted, in that it assumes that Mann will continue his breach of the rules until his action is struck out. That may or may not happen. Mann may seek leave to comply out of time, which he will no doubt be granted, but then he must produce the material which he appears desperate not to disclose.

If he does not produce it, he will be struck out, if he does produce it, his shoddy work will be before the Court for examination. Either way, we can expect the result which the article asserts, but the article is wrong in proclaiming it in the present circumstances. Realistically, things look good for Ball.

Leo

Witless will say he unwittingly quoted the wrong person. He will claim his historical analogies don't need to be accurate.

That's his usual form.

Now, now nutter. You are on record as admitting that climate change is real. A bit late to start hustling backwards now.
"btw I too believe the climate is changing."
Posted by imajulianutter, Saturday, 22 March 2014 7:11:49 PM

Halduell, climate change is real, by the OED definition of the words “climate” and “change”, not by the weasel worded, falsehood based definition of the phrase “climate change” by the crooks at the IPCC, which is baseless fantasy.

Dear Leo Lane,

You are good fun my friend.

You are simply too cunning for the snares of this poor hunter so therefore I will have to ask you again directly; was President Bush a liar and a fraudster for saying what he did about global warming?

Please note your answer does not require you to contemplate any facts whatsoever, which is comforting given your previous form, but only your opinion.

Please understand this point, you might be a great bloke in real life but your continuous use of the words 'crook', 'fraudster', 'liar' etc in connection of those who quite reasonably accept the science around climate change is unfair, derogatory, malicious, demeaning, baseless and spiteful. As you have not quite been relegated just yet to fringe dweller status like nutter those words have import and will elicit a response from me even if it just a little nip at the heels.

Dear halduell,

Given the earlier posts I had thought nutter was calling ant 'witless' but I now think on this occasion he seems to be referring to me. The best course of action is probably to put a dollar in his cup and slide on past.

'nutter: "All these issues have been covered I depth on previous threads......Key to many of them was information, current and referenced, provided by Cohenite."

Is that an appeal to cohenite's "authority"? Think for yourself, 'nutter. At least cohenite opines on research, while you name call, belch slogans, and run away with an appeal to read others.

You say the climate is changing, but why is the current rate of global warming unprecedented over the history of civilization and well beyond. Do you hold knowledge science has not yet considered?

"Cheers kiddies", indeed.