The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Nature's nature > Comments

Nature's nature : Comments

By Ian Nance, published 27/2/2014

Nature provides an antidote to the violence of human life.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 12
  7. 13
  8. 14
  9. Page 15
  10. 16
  11. 17
  12. 18
  13. 19
  14. All
Well that's strange. Now that I try the first link on a computer, I'm no long told that it's blocked due a DMCA complaint.

So anyway, OUG, in other words, you have nothing left. I didn't think you would. Nothing but mockery and ridicule with your 'blah, blah, blahs', anyway.

And you still haven't answered any of my questions. There's quite a backlog now.
Posted by AJ Philips, Wednesday, 26 March 2014 7:23:14 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
LO..YOUR ONE TO TALK..RE IGNORING QUESTions
you are in denial/..my old fart
THREE LINKS WOULD HAVE Suggested the 20 NESSISARY STEPS
[ingredients if you will/that theorize..TO MAKE LIFE

THE REALITY IS CLOSER TO THE 600 YOU theories/need
your..LOL claim..of a modern 'evolution..of some far SIMPLER CELL[THAT CLEARLY CANT REPLICATE..WITHOUT BURSTING ITS CLAY CELL WALL.is pure delusional thinking

CLAY Bubles dont DIVIDE/THUS CANT REPLICATE TO 'EVOLVE'
get it/old shoe LACE?

ITS UNSURE..IF YOUR just plain ignorant..or simply lost in your own CIRCULAR/themed/AVOIDANCE..YOU OFFER as if PROOF..pURE/RUBBISH..[the inAGRY..WAS THE NON LINKED JUNK HE JUST REJECTED LINKED..

THEN AVOID GOING TO my links..then crappon like you got some science rubbish..[you fail to present]..its clear your just wanting the last word..SO I WILL LET YOU Have it

or just RESUME..doing
before/you DISTRACTED..THE THread..with youtuBE..

you say unreplied questions..but im SICK OF RE READING FOR junk you slip into the middle of insults..PLEASE LIST THE THINGS AGAIN

IF YOU WANT ME TO find reply..FOR YOU/YET AGAIN..WILL YOU READ THE LINKS..OF COURSE NOT..thats why we are here now..YOU SIMPLY PLAying some game

Do as you chose..ITS CLEAR YOUR PLAYING WITH Yourself
the links are there for OTHERS TO FIND..OUT FOR THEM SELF/WHO SAID WHAT

from my search term
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=20+steps+to+liviNg+cell+life&i
Imitation of Life » American Scientist
https://www.americanscientist.org/issues/pub/imitation-of-life
‎

9 Feb 2013 ... The first step would be to decipher its complete genetic sequence, which ... of life”
in 600 steps and “completely understanding” a living cell still ...

The Origin of Life



To account for the origin of life on our earth requires solving several problems: ....
It is a single organism whose cells have lost their ability to live independently. ...
In Volvox this process goes no further than having certain cells specialize for ...
The same team reported on 20 May 2010 in the online Science Express that they
...
#
Phases of mitosis | Cell division | Khan Academy
www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/cell-division/v/phases-of-mitosis
‎



Explanation of the phases of mitosis.
Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 26 March 2014 8:24:25 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
OUG,

I'm pretty sure I've answered all your questions. Those that I've dismissed were dismissed due to their fallaciousness or because they were simply attacking a strawman, and I've made attempts to at least point this out in these cases. You, on the other hand, would simply steam on as if nothing had been said.

Most of the rest of your post is just you lashing out at me for not playing your game the way you need me to. You hate that I save time by referring you to videos refuting your claims and when you have nothing to counter them, and your attempts to distract from what they say don't work, you lash out at me as though I were cheating in some way. You accuse me of wasting your time while, ironically, trying to waste mine by demanding that I type out the rebuttals from the videos.

Thanks for the link to the website explaining these "steps to life" you've been going on about. Unfortunately, though, it's referring to the complex and evolved life forms that we know today, not the primitive cells that would have been around billions of years ago. You're really having troubles making this distinction, aren't you.
Posted by AJ Philips, Wednesday, 26 March 2014 8:53:17 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
PJ/QUOTE..<<..the primitive cells..that would/have been.around billions..of years ago...You're really/having troubles..making this distinction,/aren't you.>>

YEAH..LIFE/FROM..CRYSTALS,,[HUH?}
IM LOST.*WONDERING HOw the freak..one as clever
AS you can..appear.*to be..can yet..be so/SIMPLY..deceived

<<..Primitive cell/From/Wikipedia,

The parallelogram..is the..general primitive cell..for the plane.>>

YEAH/BUT..ITS NOT LIFE

<<.A parallelepiped..is a general primitive cell.-for 3-dimensional space.>>

[IN theory..its a cell/BUT
BY PICTURES ITS A CRYSTAL]..thus not 'life'

<<..A primitive/cell..is a unit-cell>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_cell#Unit_cell

ESSENTIALLY LIKE...A SALT CRYSTAL..BUTT..[its not..LIFE

<<..built on..the primitive basis..of the direct lattice,..namely a crystallographic basis..of the vector lattice..L..such that every lattice vector..t of L..may be obtained..as an integral linear combination..of the basis vectors,..a.b..c...

Used predominantly in geometry,..solid state physics,..and mineralogy,...particularly in describing crystal structure>>

Ie its..a mineraL..LIKE YA STONE FOSSILS
YOU DONT Even..have imagination..YA FIND A STONE/
THAT LOOKS LIKE..AN EAR BONE..AND BINGO..A TASSIE TIGER..[marsupial pouch/breeder]..BREEDS An/egg laying] crocodile..breeeds a river dolphin...[LIFE BREDER]..that breeds an egg laying sturgeon..THAT builds a baleens toothless what>? mammaL.

its insanity/taught..kids/by rote
to children/who believe..in satan claws only comes..in chimiNIES
CLEARLY TRYING...TO RECREATE..A PRIMITIVE CELL..and the ester rabbit that lays..'brown'-eGGS..that..$melt..in ya mmouth

<<..,a primitive cell,,is a minimum volume cell..corresponding to a single lattice point..of a structure..with translational symmetry in 2 dimensions,..3 dimensions,..[lo]..or other dimensions...A lattice can be characterized..by the geometry of its primitive cell.

The primitive cell..is a fundamental domain>>

in non living/things

<<..with respect to..translational symmetry only...In the case of additional symmetries..a fundamental domain is smaller.>>..in/life/non-existant.

LIKE I SAID
BLAH..BLAH/BLAH/BAH..BAA..BAA..BAA

its sad..THAT/yOU CANT REASON/../THOUGH..YOUR MIND CAN RECALL
IT..SEEMS TO RECALL..MULTITUDES..OF ABSURDITIES..as usual without an.. written link..[like any conman/Deceiver..your careful to avoid putting it into writing..oR ATTRIBUTING IT..TO A..real-SCIENCE..[PRIMITIVE CELL RELATES..TO THE Science of crystallography..or matH..NOT Biology..*NOT LIFE]

PLEASE STOP..TRYING TO MAKE ME SOUND..SO CLEVER
I NEVER HEARD OF YA PRIMATE...PRIMITIVE CELL..Before you threw it aINST THE WALL..TRYING TO GET YA Mucky abiogenus/muck..to stick/sadly im not even aNgry..

just sad..your so deceived..that
you..MINDLESSLY..deceived others..SIMPLY/by mis-belief/..

MISPLACED FAITH..IN LIARS
think/why..they want..the god free creation delusion..

For the life of me..i cant seE..what so frightens you
[your certainly..not fooling no one.]..AND ONLY decievers go to hell.
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 27 March 2014 8:46:17 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
OUG,

The only rebuttals you seem to be able to make are the Argument from Incredulity fallacy (as you displayed with the pictures of the transitional whale species), an over simplification of the science (e.g. “YEAH..LIFE/FROM..CRYSTALS” (also an argument from incredulity)), or an outright misrepresentation (e.g. “NOTHING IN dna refutes fossil..lol..no dna in stone you fw”).

All of which you have committed once again in your most recent post, invalidating everything you’ve said.

So, to put it in words you’ll probably understand…

YA/GOT..NUTTINg[LOL]

P.S. A point that I thought I had made before, but must have accidentally deleted from my response, was the fact that pig heart valves are more suitable than ape heart valves because they’re the right size and are far cheaper to acquire. The similarity of the DNA in them is irrelevant.
Posted by AJ Philips, Thursday, 27 March 2014 5:12:48 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
aj/quote..<<..The only rebuttals you seem to be able to make
are the Argument..from Incredulity fallacy..(as you displayed with the pictures of the transitional whale species..>>,

JUST FOUND A NEW ONE
http://www.uncommondescent.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/whale-transition.gif

it provides another problem
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/a-whale-of-a-problem-for-evolution-ancient-whale-jawbone-found-in-antartica/

IF YOU HADN'T RAISED IT..I WOULD NEVER HAVE Searched for it
BECAUSE THE OTHER LINK WAS INSANE/LOOK AT THE TWO DIFFERENT GIFS AGAIN

http://www.google.com.au/search?q=WHALE+JAWBOnes+vary+IN+SIZE&

then you who posts movies/tubES..acuse me of..<<>.an over simplification of the science (e.g. “YEAH..LIFE/FROM..CRYSTALS”>>

WHAT NO REFUTER?
you say a magic word>>i reveal links explaining the words meaning>>yes i simplify by sorting the bull from the fact..LOL..BUT..NOT YOU/EH?

YOU LIST THREE STRENGTHS>>CAll them weak
>>by no proof/no rebuttal..only joiner..nuthn>>sad SAD SAD

<<..(also an argument from incredulity)), or an outright misrepresentation.(e.g. “NOTHING IN dna refutes fossil..lol..no dna in stone you fw”).>>

the your/youtube/link..said..nothing in dna...refutes FOSSILS
[TAKEN FROM THe vidio..you said proved your theses]

from memory that was about the time...they were showing the skulls they just said arnt linked to man/APE DECENT[THE APE CONNECTION WAS EVEN IGNORED]

NOW YOU TRY TO MAKE SOME POINT..[YOUR OWN/..?
[YOUR PROOF SAID IT/..not me]

i simply refuted..<<>..no dna in stone you fw”).>>
AND/THERE ISN'T/NO DNA..IN FOSSILIZED STONE[NOR PLASTER=-VASTS]..NOR..Resin/,as most fossils realy be.

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY..how you finished
this NON FACTUAL evidence free Rebuttal?

<<>>All of which..you have committed..once again
in your most recent post,..invalidating everything..you’ve said.>>

I VALIDATE/WHAT I SAY
YOUR the big detractor..that flays out blindly..THEN FADES AWAY
BUT I LOVE how Its making me learn..[Confirm]..EVEN MORE THAN I WANTED TO KNOW
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=why+are+pig+heart+valves+not+rejected&ie=ut

So, to put it in words
..you’ll probably understand…

YA/GOT..NUTTINg[LOL]
The porcine (or pig)..heart is most similar..to the human heart,
and therefore represents..the best anatomical fit..for replacement.

say/*/oink..oink..mummy.
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 27 March 2014 5:57:18 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 12
  7. 13
  8. 14
  9. Page 15
  10. 16
  11. 17
  12. 18
  13. 19
  14. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy