"Brian, great article. Now please point me to one peer reviewed article that proves AGW."

Nutter, science does not work that way. Each article adds to the mass of evidence.

All that is needed is one article to disprove AGW but, and it's a big but, the meteorology and climatology scientific community has to accept that the theory behind the methodology is accurate, that the results were validly obtained using that methodology, and that those results were accurately and validly interpreted. Oh, and that the whole thing is capable of being repeated by different people and obtaining the same results i.e. the results are reliable.

All of this goes on in peer-reviewed academia which I will concede many on this topic see as a world-wide conspiracy.

All it takes is one peer-reviewed article to disprove AGW.

I am still waiting.

Wait no longer Brian:

http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/man-made-global-warming-wrong-ten.html

http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/has-man-made-global-warming-been.html

http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/has-global-warming-been-disproved-part-2.html

All the papers are fully referenced.

But let's face it, you wouldn't change your 'mind' about AGW if God himself settled on Earth and said AGW is garbage because you BELIEVE in AGW.

AGW acolytes BELIEVE in it; it is not an intellectual exercise for you but an emotional and spiritual one.

Brian

Why is there no peer reviewed article proving AGW?

If all it takes is one peer reviewed article to disprove it, and there are many, why can't one peer reviewed article prove it.

Peer reviewed articles stating increases in co2 historically follow warming are quite common. Wouldn't they suffice? If not why not?
Isn't AGW predicated on increasing co2 any more?

Cohenite, I will not argue with you if you cannot tell the difference between fully referenced and peer reviewed.

Nutter, look up Popper and Falsifiability.

I am out of here

Brian

Brian, the papers discussed are ALL peer reviewed! Just amazing; thanks for proving my point.

Dear cohenite,

You have just out nutted imajulianutter and believe me that would take some doing!

Peer reviewed? Properly referenced?

I clicked on the first one and you haven't even bothered to put your bloody name on it.

http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/has-man-made-global-warming-been.html

You had my derision but now you have my sympathy. You really do need a Bex and a good lie down my friend.