Cornie said:

"While the vast majority of Australians know that if your taking advice from a lawyer you’re in a dark place.
But If you’re getting your science facts from one then you’re in a silly place."

Make that:
"While the vast majority of Australians know that if your taking advice from cornie, you’re in a dark place.
But If you’re getting your science facts from one who knows his subject, you are getting accurate information."

Anthony Cox is looking at the claims by the BoM.

Dr Jennifer Marohasy also doubts their accuracy and has requested details.

So far, the BoM has not responded to her reasonable requests.

They must know that FOI will expose their inaccuracies.

http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2014/01/requesting-verification-of-2013.html

For Leo Dorfman,

I am most definitely NOT anti-science.

I am most definitely NOT commenting on false science.

Google:

"Leo Dorfman" and "climate sceptics"

Make your own mind up.

What gibberish from doc and corny; can anyone make a considered response to the article, even if it is wrong? Where is Agro when you want a decent argument?

Hi Anthony,

This seems to be one of the few places left where the science is still being discussed. In the rest of the world in general and the EU in particular, the debate has now moved to economics and politics.

One of the best summations of the global state of play for CAGW came this week from Graham Lloyd, “Green Dream On Ice As ‘Coal Frenzy’ Grips Europe”.
The Australian, 11 January 2014

In his comments on media reports from around the world, there is not a single mention of the science? It is also clear that the last remnants of CAGW are Euro-centric and much as our own media might like is to be otherwise, by not reporting it, CAGW seems set to collapse completely.

Sadly, many Australian members of the warmertariat will be shocked because they knew nothing of what was really going on, they will be ill prepared for the news and will have to quickly find another “cause”