Aww Haz, isn’t it time to gave up your completely illogical complete denialism of human-induced global warming?

<< …when we are just sweeping the last bits of rubbish from the failed fraud out the door of history… >>

MMMmmm, sure. Just the opposite is happening.

The mad denialist brigade, who can’t deny AGW because they just completely can’t know that it is not real, are on their last legs…. soon to be swept away…. as were the flat-earthers all those years ago.

Splutter splutter pfft pfft tfff..... zzzz.

Yoo hoo, John Coulter.

Antarctic ice sheets have now reached their maximum extent since photo reconnaissance satellites first measured them in 1969.

Please explain?

Extraordinary !
Now the warming proponents are becoming deniers !

The author of this piece is denying the IPCC's finding that they have
low confidence that co2 is causing extraordinary weather events.

As I have said earlier I don't !know! that co2 causes global warming
or does not but it certainly has all the atmosphere of a campaign.
Now the IPCC seems to be having second thoughts.

Dear Hasbeen

As always, playing the man and not the ball. I can assure you John Coulter retained his integrity when he entered the Senate as an Australian Democrat and is an intellectual force today, even in his eighties. This article is evidence. He has great depth of knowledge on sustainability issues including resources and climate change. John Coulter, more than just about anyone in this country, has a holistic approach - he can see the interconnections between the major challenges confronting us: overpopulation, biodiversity loss, resource scarcity and climate change.

Trouble is, he's too good for this Forum...

Again, an article in support of Climate Change from someone who is not a climate scientist. Where are all the climate scientists? Keeping their mouths shut of course, they know all this is unsubstantiated but say nothing because they benefit from it.

John,

It’s hard to imagine that intelligent people could follow such a flawed mantra. The IPCC’s politicization of climate change should be enough for most people to be cautious.

As a non scientist I find it hard to follow either the science or the pseudo-science promoted by those who likewise are non scientists.

It has always intrigued me that if this is indeed a monumental fraud, how could IPCC actually achieve this?

The following from one of the IPCC’s own expert reviewers throws much light on the IPCC’s processes.

“Dr Gray has been an expert reviewer of all five ARs, and leaves no one in any doubt about their misrepresentations and worthlessness”.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/10/13/ipcc-in-a-stew-how-they-cooked-their-latest-climate-books/3/