If one looks at the index of Tanton's The Social Contract Press TSCP from winter 1997-98, a special on Australia, several Australians or 'usual suspects' pop up, with Tanton last contribution (pg2):

http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=15206

Of interest is Denis McCormack of the Reduce Immigration Party and declares he is the Oz correspondent for TSCP:

http://www.ironbarkresources.com/articles/mccormack.htm

Coincidentally he promotes a "write-on" campaign:

http://reduceimmigration.wordpress.com/links/why-should-immigration-be-reduced/

as promoted on VDare's website:

http://www.vdare.com/posts/write-on-campaign-in-australia

Who are Vdare?

" VDARE.com is an anti-immigration hate website "dedicated to preserving our historical unity as Americans into the 21st Century." VDARE.com also regularly publishes articles by prominent white nationalists, race scientists and anti-Semites." (many of whom have contributed to TSCP, regularly)

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/groups/VDARE

Lucky for sustainability and the environment that everybody seems to know everyone else, yet are rather coy.

In addition the fact that even most Republicans avoid Tanton:

http://www.cafeconlecherepublicans.com/smoking-gun-memo-proves-tanton-network-manipulates-republicans

Interesting how the various 'environmentalists', like VDare (not unlike BNP) which Tanton and TSCP liaise with, use 'electoral tactics':

'Green washing is portraying oneself as pro-environment but camouflaging the anti-immigration motives. While the SPP's rhetoric sits to the left of the Greens, its policies would find a home with the British National Party.'

Coincidentally the pro environment group Sierra Club in the USA was the subject of a takeover from 1998:

“Without a doubt,” wrote law center staffer Mark Potok, “the Sierra Club is the subject of a hostile takeover attempt by forces allied with Tanton and a variety of right-wing extremists.”

http://grist.org/article/nijhuis-sierra/

but eventually "How the Sierra Club Learned to Love Immigration":

http://colorlines.com/archives/2013/05/how_sierra_club_learned_to_stop_worrying_and_grew_to_love_immigration.html

"No more than 4 posts per article in any given 24 hour period."

How about a limit on authors rehashing the same material over and over again?

This is the *fourth* anti-SPP article by Malcolm King this year.
The last was just 7 weeks ago.

Why is OLO being so indulgent?

The two postings above by Andras Smith are typical of his work. As I have pointed out "Andras Smith” is pretty clearly the Andrew Smith who used to post inflammatory comments on the academic website “The Conversation”, where he was accused of being a troll and much criticised. He was also forced to admit he was a migration agent, which means he had a vested interest in the arguments he was making for high immigration and rapid population growth. (Failing to draw attention to one’s vested interests is a No-No on that website.)

As Shockadelic points out, Smith relies on ad hominem arguments to cover an indifference to evidence. Smith’s modus operandi (as identifiable as a fingerprint) is to trawl through highly polemicized US websites for material to discredit US environmentalists and population campaigners, and then attempt to attach guilt by association to his Australian opponents. (He works a double-act with Malcolm King.) Apart from this being an invalid argument, it seems not to have occurred to Mr Smith that he could far more easily be tarred in the same way by association with prominent Australian pro-population-growth advocates, since these include a remarkable number of business persons who have been “disgraced” or pursued by the National Crimes Authority.

Concrete and sensible arguments for stabilising Australia's population can be found on the website of the Stable Population Party at http://www.populationparty.org.au/ Note that this group has no need to run Smith's and King's type of ad hominem attacks, because it can offer hard data and logical arguments.

Malcolm Cheryl Paddy King is a troll who writes articles for vested interests.
It is fruitless to argue or debate him because he is only doing it for the money.
The best way to remove this pest from forums is not answer him at all.
With any luck he will give up and go away till he comes up with another pseudonym.

Poor SPP's. They have adopted a 'last days of Hitler' in the bunker mentality. They think these unpaid news stories in OLO, New Matilda, Green Left Weekly, News Ltd, the Greens internal bulletins and the local newspapers are good news - like the sound of Russian artillery.

It's only a small group of people who have formed their own cult and accuse everyone who has done critical research of being trolls. Shockadelic even wants to censor me because I have pulled the plug on their dangerous little sociobiological and sociopathic party. Here's a heads up. I'm not the only one.

I was beaten to the punch by a week re the dodgy relationship between Numbers USA and the SPP. A senior News Ltd journo had been there before me. Oh dear.