Poirot's position is irrelevant because the majority, if not all, of the illegals are muslims.

Muslims cannot be checked as to their suitability for living in a democracy because islam is incompatible with Western democracy.

This whole discussion about vetting is surreal. Islamic societies are inherently oppressive so naturally there is a case for refugee status on the basis of the illegals' origin. But as is shown by every Western nation where the % of islam exceeds about 5% those illegals who come here to escape the Islamic oppression invariably commence establishing the type of Islamic society they left.

The position of people like Poirot is so removed from reality as to be insane; certainly HER [he is a she Philip S} position is demonstrably against the best interests of Australia continuing as a democratic society.

You don't have a dog do you Poirot? If so you had better watch out:

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-1-193699-Malaysian-arrested-over-Eid-greeting-featuring-dogs