No Poirot, you know full well that the solution to which I was referring was specifically how to restore the CAGW infrastructure, without which there can be no global response to your global warming.

You try to mix this up with all the renewable energy thought bubbles, alarmism and pseudo-science links as a diversion. The point I’m making is that all this stuff has already failed to convince the global infrastructure needed to fix your global problem because it has all gone.

I say again, what do you offer as a solution to the problem of losing the CAGW global response mechanisms, without which there can be NO global response to the GLOBAL problem?

The endless proselytizing links and rehashing of local renewable thought bubbles has nothing to do with it.

Poirot, I predicted last year that warmers had a number of choices, they could jump ship now, have an exit plan, have a bob each way or cling on saying and please God let me be right.

Do I detect some of these elements in your last post?

<<People like me enjoy a bit of stouch and offer up inks to people with expertise...nothing more, nothing less. This forum is not a place to argue the technicalities of the actual science. It's an opinion forum inhabited in the main by laymen>>.

Oh dear Poirot, what ever happened to your passion and conviction, just a game now is it? Or perhaps you really don’t have any understanding as to why this whole thing has collapsed or any solution?

Are we seeing a bit of “a bob each way bet” emerging with just a touch an “exit plan”.

spindoc,

You appear to be labouring under the misapprehension that the purposeful dissemination of dud science by those defending the big business/oil status quo, and the subsequent inaction by governments (of which Canada would be a good example) equates to "AGW has been disproven".

The relative "inaction" is not related to the veracity of the science - It is related to deliberate misinformation and political and economic prerogatives.

Frogs in a pot.

That’s more like it Poirot, back to your old self again.

Sadly it’s too late you’ve already blown it, you can never go back.

Remember you told us << the people who do understand the science "aren't here”. We agree.

Remember you told us you << enjoy a bit of stouch and offer up inks to people with expertise...nothing more, nothing less >> Yep, agree that too.

Remember you told us << This forum is not a place to argue the technicalities of the actual science >> Yep, agree that one in spades.

Remember you told us << It's an opinion forum inhabited in the main by laymen >> OK, if you insist, agreed.

Just remember the next time you post on this topic, you have failed multiple times to address the question because “it’s just a bit of fun, it’s only opinions, no experts here, just laymen and this is not the place for science”.

I think the “exit plan” would have been less embarrassing for you. Ooops!

Hi Rhostry, I am interested in your statement,

"Posted by Rhrosty, Sunday, 19 May 2013 10:24:33 AM

Find out more about this user
Hi Chris.
We make ceramic fuel cells here."

Could you please email me privately at geoffreykelley@bigpond.com and send me some details of your systems?

Regards,

Geoffrey Kelley

Not embarrassing at all, spindoc.

Just reality.

The deniers on this forum are not scientists....and if they link, it's usually to minority contrarian data or "skeptic" blogs run by people who aren't scientists.

And then we have the likes of you, whose whole argument isn't based on science, but instead on the tardiness of self-absorbed carbon burning nations to recognise the problem and do something about it.

The only reason you don't have an "exit" plan is because you never really broached the "entry" in any pertinent way. Wafting around on the sidelines with no science, just playing spoiler......Watts and Nova would be proud of you.

Dear Parrot,

<< The only reason you don't have an "exit" plan is because you never really broached the "entry" in any pertinent way >>.

Correct, you are so smart and so perceptive. I never bought it in the first place under any circumstances so I don’t need one, Doh!

But you did sweetie.

<< Wafting around on the sidelines with no science, just playing spoiler …>>

Hang on Poirot, no science? I’ve always said I was not a scientist but you said just this morning that;

<< the people who do understand the science "aren't here, This forum is not a place to argue the technicalities of the actual science >>, and that << It's an opinion forum inhabited in the main by laymen>>.

Ah I get it, you want your science and your credibility back again, sorry, no deal.

You said it, you live with it Parrot. You are looking sillier and sillier but I like that in a warmer.

P.S where are all your friends? I suspect you may have blown their credibility as well?

Tish, Tish, can’t wait to hear from them, they must be seething with you but you could always switch to peak food, peak oil, peak population or something like that, but on the other hand you may blow that as well.