The Forum > Article Comments > Conscription was an abuse > Comments
Conscription was an abuse : Comments
By Bruce Haigh, published 22/1/2013The Judicial Inquiry should look at the ethics, effect, equity and justice of conscription. It was an abuse of power and of people.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
-
- All
I take it that Aus must have declared war on North Vietnam (or at least against its incursion into the South) before committing troops to that engagement - or am I wrong in this regard? Or does our parliament not 'declare war' on anyone anymore, but only agrees to a troop deployment to an area of conflict of concern to our national security interests?
The Aus government of the day must surely have considered our engagement in the Vietnam theatre to be justified (in the National interest), and accordingly approved the deployment of our Regular troops to that theatre (just as it must have approved our engagements in Korea and Malaya, and in Sabah - although this latter was described as a Columbo Plan exercise, coinciding with the Indonesian Confrontation)?
Having approved our 'engagement' in South Vietnam, and finding our capacity failing to meet ours, or our Allies' expectations, regarding our reasonable commitments to that escalating conflict, was it unreasonable, in the circumstances, to introduce Conscription as a potentially 'fair and equitable' way to bridge the gap? Or, do you take exception to there not being a call for volunteers, or perhaps a national plebiscite, before acting?
Is it the fact or the means, to which you take such exception?
We provide assistance to near neighbours in distress - PNG, East Timor, etc - and support our traditional Allies when called upon (in our national interest), but it is almost certain that a call for volunteers would have been pitifully short of the mark in the Vietnam era - era of flower-power, Woodstock, peace, love and drugs, remember? So, what options, other than Conscription?