The Forum > Article Comments > Mugged by Ann Coulter > Comments
Mugged by Ann Coulter : Comments
By Ben-Peter Terpstra, published 6/11/2012Coulter reminds us that: Republicans opposed slavery, Democrats protected slave owners; Republicans supported anti-lynching laws, Democrats protected lynching mobs, and so on.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
-
- All
Posted by Daffy Duck, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 8:02:40 AM
| |
I've seldom watched such vile sentiments as those that Ann Coulter regularly trotted out on the few occasions I witnessed her on Fox News.
Here's a little background on her: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Ann_Coulter There's a penchant for those involved with the "Fox-Right" in America to trawl through other times and other zeitgeists in an attempt to topple Democrats in this era. Glenn Beck (on Fox News at the time) spent months trying to link Obama to a Communist plot. If my memory serves me, Beck's case rested on Obama's grand-daddy fighting colonialist forces in Africa way back when - or some such wild and wooly premise. This technigue is stock-standard junk right-wing propaganda designed to sway (even further) the Tea Party audience in the US. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 8:16:09 AM
| |
The Claim:
And although some Democrats finally supported the famous Civil Rights Act of 1964, Republicans voted in far greater numbers for it. The Facts: Vote totals Totals are in "YeaNay" format: The original House version: 290130 (6931%). Cloture in the Senate: 7129 (7129%). The Senate version: 7327 (7327%). The Senate version, as voted on by the House: 289126 (7030%). By party The original House version:[16] Democratic Party: 15296 (6139%) Republican Party: 13834 (8020%) Cloture in the Senate:[17] Democratic Party: 4423 (6634%) Republican Party: 276 (8218%) The Senate version:[16] Democratic Party: 4621 (6931%) Republican Party: 276 (8218%) The Senate version, voted on by the House:[16] Democratic Party: 15391 (6337%) Republican Party: 13635 (8020%) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964 Posted by Chris C, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 9:10:24 AM
| |
as in Australia the left hate to have their bigotry and hatred exposed. I take it that is why they demonise Coulter.
Posted by runner, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 9:34:16 AM
| |
runner,
You're at it again... B - is for Bigotry H - is for Hatred (runner's Book of Vile Epithets and Insults) Coulter's line is " vile hate speech". She is noted "for despising anyone politically left of Ronald Reagan". She is "a vitriolic right-wing ideologue". You may think that is something to revere, but most fair-thinking people reject fundamentalism, whatever form it takes. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 9:53:09 AM
| |
Ann Coulter as a source, put on the dunces hat and stand in the corner Ben.
Posted by Kenny, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 11:23:14 AM
|
Speaking of USA (even New York Times) best sellers each of the volumes of the psychotic Left Behind series of books by Lahaye and Jenkins were best sellers.