The Forum > Article Comments > Mugged by Ann Coulter > Comments
Mugged by Ann Coulter : Comments
By Ben-Peter Terpstra, published 6/11/2012Coulter reminds us that: Republicans opposed slavery, Democrats protected slave owners; Republicans supported anti-lynching laws, Democrats protected lynching mobs, and so on.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
-
- All
Posted by runner, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 11:40:11 AM
| |
runner,
Describing someone's style of speech as vile is not the same as pasting their fundamental nature with vices - which is your usual line of engagement. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 11:54:29 AM
| |
A very strange reconstruction of history. In the Civil War the Democrats split amongst those who supported the war and those in the South who were against. I'm sure readers understand that the Democrats and the Republicans of the 1800s bear no resemblance (or relation) to the parties we have today.
Do we blame FDR (a Republican) for the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour? Silly. Posted by Cheryl, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 12:40:29 PM
| |
Poirot
'Describing someone's style of speech as vile is not the same as pasting their fundamental nature with vices - which is your usual line of engagement. ' Oh what a covenient way to excuse such language. Such self righteousness. Posted by runner, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 1:03:28 PM
| |
I can't argue with you on this point, runner.
"Such language" is your specialty. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 1:12:47 PM
| |
I think NOFX's description of Ann Coulter is the most accurate I've ever heard:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUZ5gGO0_Pw About 55 seconds in if you want to skip ahead. Cheers, Tony Posted by Tony Lavis, Tuesday, 6 November 2012 2:35:52 PM
|
I suggest you look at your own post and google the word 'vile 'before throwing stones.