The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Arabian nightmares > Comments

Arabian nightmares : Comments

By Julie Bishop, published 9/8/2012

Any internal upheaval within Saudi Arabia with the potential to disrupt its crude oil production, even temporarily, would send shock waves through the global economy as prices would inevitably sky rocket.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
Foreboding indeed, especially when Australia is so dependent on fuel from Singapore (since we have allowed so many of our refineries to close and we do not have the IEA-mandated 90 days of fuel stockpile) and Singapore sources much of its crude oil from the Middle East. The current assumption is that, if supplies from Singapore fail, then we will just source our just-in-time fuel supply from somewhere else in Asia but, if the world is in a general crude-oil supply crisis who will we source this fuel from? Conclusion - we're screwed!

Both Liberal and Labor share the blame federally and at state level for failing to take fuel security seriously and putting a little supply/storage redundancy in place. The cost of doing that would have been minimal compared to wasting billions on new fighter aircraft that cannot fly without fuel. There is no "defence in depth" without fuel! (And there is no food supply to Coles and Woolies either.)
Posted by michael_in_adelaide, Thursday, 9 August 2012 9:47:24 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Thanks again, Auntie Julie, for our weekly dose of fear-mongering.

It is important to stir the pot, to make people feel anxious, to make them feel that Australia must continue to be beholden to the American-Western-Conservative-Capitalist Coalition otherwise catastrophe will strike followed by calamity and chaos and the end of the world.

Of course, some folk, not many, reject this infantile indoctrination. They are called 'thinkers.' They refuse to become pawns in cunning political and corporate games.

Cheers.
Posted by David G, Thursday, 9 August 2012 10:20:24 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Michael-in-Adelaide, you get it mate.
Fortunately, we have possibly massive reserves of easily accessed hydrocarbons to our immediate north.
When petrol climbs above $5.00 a litre, we will have no other choice but to explore and develop these reserves; because, ever increasing volatility threatens oil Middle East supplies.
Without fuel we are defenceless!
Without fuel we will starve!
Without fuel no plane will fly, no ship will sail, no truck will haul essentials on our highways. Without fuel, no train will haul bulk goods and the economy will die.
The green element claimed that northern tourism, would more than offset any lost income that might have been generated by potential hydrocarbon reserves?
Many tourist operators are slowly going broke; or, are already bankrupt! And now the region and the former tourist industry is awash with mental health issues.
The Townsville trough is thought to hold around 5 billion barrels of virtually ready to use sweet light crude. Given the extreme conservationism with which these calculations are usually made, the reserves are probably three times that number?
Even were we to earn only a dollar a barrel, this reserve alone would pay for 5 rigs, three of which could be placed over much larger reserves, just a little further out.
And yes, we do need foreign capital!
But wouldn't it be better if it came as trillions from oil export earnings, rather than as exponentially increasing, already record foreign debt, which we Aussies are obliged to service in all manner of ways! One is premium prices, 30%+ above par, at the checkout, or unaffordable housing?
It's time to bury the mindless mantra, which goes, "the govt has no business in business."
Which alone, is all that prevents it from getting into the ever increasingly lucrative oil business!
Which is more important, a modest deficit, which would be completely repaid by future earnings?
Or, even more foreign debt that is never ever repaid, but needs to be eternally serviced?
Cheers, Rhrosty.
Posted by Rhrosty, Thursday, 9 August 2012 11:53:45 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Another It's not my fualt and I will not do anything about it article by Julie. Oh for a Polly of substance for Australia.
Posted by Kenny, Thursday, 9 August 2012 12:44:38 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Julie, it is time we collectively realised, there is no way and no statesman that can negotiate/mediate any kind of lasting peace in the middle east!
Fundamental activists realise that oil is indeed their most potent weapon; and, even in very modest numbers, are adding to the multi-faceted division and rabble rousing, that simply exacerbates/foments the unrest.
A very fundamental, sabre rattling, missile armed Iran, threatens the Straights of Homuz; and along with ongoing Egyptian unrest, threatens the Suez canal.
Most of the world's oil flow through one or both these narrow waterways!
Surely it is long past time we removed the Ideological straight jackets; and mindless mantras, which is all that prevents we Australians, from exploring and developing our own possibly massive hydrocarbon reserves?
[Other even more conservative govts already have!]
Most of which, likely lays in our north eastern economic zone.
If these reserves live up to the prognostications of numerous industry experts; they could even rival or eclipse all known Middle Eastern hydrocarbon reserves.
First and foremost finding and tapping into those, lower cost to us reserves, would allow us to produce four times less carbon, than currently created by local transport options.
Moreover, we would be able to quarantine our own economy, from the logical end point of Middle East unrest?
And indeed, via income earning hydrocarbon exports, do as much for our allies/friends and other important to us economies, still currently dependant in whole our part, on Middle Eastern supplies?
Singapore, NZ, USA, Japan, Taiwan, Korea, China etc.
If we hold any concern whatsoever, for either the environment or the economy; then simply standing on the sidelines wringing our hands or throwing them up and doing nothing, is no longer an option!
Rhrosty.
Posted by Rhrosty, Thursday, 9 August 2012 12:53:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Julie,

Iran is Shia. That is the influencing factor in any disturbance in Saudi Arabia. I believe given Iran's isolation and threat to it's regional influence it is logical they would foster discontent in SA. It is their only means of threatening the west.

That the stability of SA is momentus in terms of economic conditions worldwide warrents the scrutiny of both our Government and it's alternative. Carr's just not up to such scope.

Anybody who has an interest in their own economic welfare and standard of living would agree
Posted by imajulianutter, Thursday, 9 August 2012 6:40:34 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy