The Forum > Article Comments > The gay marriage debate > Comments
The gay marriage debate : Comments
By Ken Davis, published 30/7/2012My chief concern is that when anyone expresses a contrary view, whether it is on religious, or like our PM - sociocultural grounds - they are abused and labelled as homophobic and intolerant.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
-
- All
Phillip used the word "Liberation" and described himself as active these past 23 years in the field of sexual Liberation, I know we're not supposed to talk about the Sexual Liberation platform, that we're just supposed to accept it so as not to be called ignorant "bigots" but the real danger to this movement comes when people like me do seek to understand and inform themselves on their goals and motivations.
The next, possibly final legal barrier to be broken down in "Gay Liberation" are age of consent and child protection laws, the theorists of Sexual Liberation (sexual communism) have never shied away from topics such as "Boy Love" and allowing Lesbians to lead the way to acceptance of child/adult sex with "A Woman's Touch".
Here's a 1980 discussion from a mainstream Left wing publication, I used to buy Semiotext from the Brunswick St Bookstore back in my Lefty/student days:
http://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/interv_kate_m.htm
Dan Savage is a very mainstream activist from the U.S who has made a living informing High School students on "Gay" issues:
http://www.rpvnetwork.org/profiles/blogs/dan-savage-we-should-acknowledge-the-existence-of-good-pedophiles