The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The day after Iran goes nuclear > Comments

The day after Iran goes nuclear : Comments

By Julie Bishop, published 29/3/2012

Iran must explain why it has refused to grant full access to international inspectors if there is nothing to hide.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All
Marilyn Shepherd.If you know about Siebil Edmonds you then know http://www.ae911truth.org/ Boiling Frogs is also a good site.James Corbett is a very articulate presenter.
Posted by Arjay, Thursday, 29 March 2012 4:49:32 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Pink Floyd ;Peace Song by Arjay.

We don't need no Iran invasion,
We don't need no thought control,
Preachers leave our rights alone,
Hey,Israel!Leave Iran alone!

All in all it's just another brick in a wall.
All in all it's just another stiff in war.

We don't need no conflagragation,
We don't need no bought control,
No dark chasm is the farce room,
Hey,NATO! Leave China alone!

All in all it's just another brick in a wall.
All in all it's just another stiff in a war.

We don't need no false flag terror,
We don't need your lust for power,
No dark chasm in the farce room,
Hey,NATO! Leave the people alone!

All in all it's just another brick in a wall,
All in all it's just another stiff in a war.

We don't need your New World Order,
We don't need your lust for power,
No dark chasm in the farce room.
Hey,Israel! Leave Iran alone!

All in all it's just another brick in a wall.
All in all it's just another trick for a war.

WW3 is looming and we'd better wake up! The goodies were never on our side.We are their debt serfs.They have stolen our super via pyramid scams and are using wars of imperialism to escape us and expand their power.The masses are awakening.
Posted by Arjay, Thursday, 29 March 2012 7:55:57 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
There is certainly a lot of "moral imperatives" in your article *Shadow Minister*

But, aah, the shared disgust of double standards.

I think a number of the other posters here have well pointed out some of those issues.

Thus, simply, if you point a weapon of mass destruction at one group, of course, they are going to do the same to you, or want to be able to do the same.

No, when you strip back the public charade, what you are really advocating for is the right to assure the wholesale destruction of your "enemies" without them having the capability of returning the favour.

..

I am recalling Pakistan's offer of the SWAT Valley to the Taliban, a matter about which there was extensive coverage provided by INDOVISION and am left wondering what would now be the state of affairs had they contained themselves?

Clearly there is a threat, but how best to advance peace?

I am also wondering had Australia, N.America and England accepted the Japanese proposal for the international recognition of racial equality, would they still have chosen war?

..

No, what the N.Americans most need in my view is a mate that will stand up publicly when required and tell them that they stink, regardless of the consequences, and be prepared to "crawl over broken glass" to bring them home when they lose their way.

..

Oh, for everyone's interest I note that, and if I interpreted correctly that which I read on the copyright council's web site some time ago, that the Australian guvment retains an unfettered power of censorship.

..

I would personally like to see old LateLine back the way it was before Howard gutted it, and enhanced to provide the audience with the views of the rest of the world, as if nothing else, it certainly helps to minimise "misunderstandings."

But then, can you really compete *Shadow Minister* or do you need to continue to run around in the shadows, puking out a nauseous stream of simplistic, one sided, rhetoric?
Posted by DreamOn, Thursday, 29 March 2012 8:13:24 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy