The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Opponents of gay marriage are fighting a rearguard action > Comments

Opponents of gay marriage are fighting a rearguard action : Comments

By Kees Bakhuijzen, published 16/3/2012

It might not be the most important issue, but it is one of the most unstoppable.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. All
Hi Jay,

I'm not sure that you understood what I posted earlier -
so I'll repeat it here for you. Here goes -

Each society views its own patterns of marriage
as self evidently right and proper, and usually
as God-given as well. Much of the current concern
about the fate of modern marriage stems from
this kind of ethnocentrism. If we assume that
there is only one "right" marriage form, then
naturally any change will be interpreted as
heralding the doom of the whole institution.

It is important to recognise therefore that there
is an immense range in marriage patterns,
that each of these patterns may be, at least
in its own context, perfectly viable,
and above all, that marriage, like any other
social institution must inevitably change through
time, in our society as in all others.

Your attitude is perfectly explainable - given
your circumstances and to you makes perfect sense.
We all understand that. But of course this does not
mean that we agree with you. The same as I don't
expect you to agree with me. Individual
differences are part and parcel of our society,
afterall.
Posted by Lexi, Saturday, 24 March 2012 7:05:58 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
cont'd ...

BTW - I'm not advocating any sort of "religious stance,"
you obviously did not understand my earlier posts.
And of course religious stances are not
inclusive. Neither is yours for obvious reasons.
Posted by Lexi, Saturday, 24 March 2012 7:12:28 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy