The Forum > Article Comments > Opponents of gay marriage are fighting a rearguard action > Comments
Opponents of gay marriage are fighting a rearguard action : Comments
By Kees Bakhuijzen, published 16/3/2012It might not be the most important issue, but it is one of the most unstoppable.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
Words change their meaning as we know and as it
happens dictionary entries are updated to reflect
the changes. The word "gay" has changed its meaning
in the course of the last 100 years. The meaning of
marriage also appears to be shifting. Dictionary
entries of course only tell you how a word is
currently used - not how it should be used. In
other words dictionaries are apolitical entities.
The people who compile them do not (cannot) allow
their feelings to influence the entries. And that is
as it should be.
Each society views its own patterns of marriage, as
self-evidently right and proper, and usually as
God-given as well. Much of the current concern
about the fate of modern marriage stems from this
kind of ethnocentrism. If we assume that there is
only one "right" marriage form, then naturally any
change will be interpreted as heralding the doom
of the whole institution.
It is important to recognise, therefore, that there is
an immense range in marriage patterns, that each of
these patterns may be, at least in its own context,
perfectly viable; and above all, that marriage, like
any other social institution, must inevitably change
through time, in our own society as in all others.
Perhaps at some point it will be no longer necessary
to clarify what kind of union is under discussion
and the various forms of mariage will simply be referred
to as "marriage." Only time will tell.