The Forum > Article Comments > Defining racism > Comments
Defining racism : Comments
By Anthony Dillon, published 9/3/2012Is a law racist just because it affects one race more than others, or must there be other elements?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Page 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- ...
- 34
- 35
- 36
-
- All
The issue I have with your article is that you deny racism has a negative effect. Your arguments are merely assertions of your interpretation of the world - you don't want to consider the effects of racism on Indigenous Australians and if you say it often enough it must be true.
I have seen racism's effects on kids at school, people seeking health care (the AMA was shocked by its research into heart disease treatment for Indigenous Australians). Racism is often subtle, and may sometimes be an unconscious act that the perpetrator was socialised in - sometimes with no ill-intent. However, this does not make its effects any less real. It does not make racism go away. Denying racism as a cause of problems does not stop the low education expectations. It does not stop stereotyping by medical staff. Denying racism does not rebuild self-esteem and combat depression and internalised sense of being a second-class citizen. Confidence and pride in identity can lessen the effect of racism but it does not mean that racism ceases to exist and harm.
Your simplistic definition of racism, recognises only overt racism. Your suggestion that because some Indigenous have succeeded in mainstream society they have not experienced racism demonstrates you have a closed mind. Andrew Bolt claims you as a good friend. Are you sure you are not saying what you think others want you to say.