The Forum > Article Comments > Finkelstein, free speech and the global warming debate > Comments
Finkelstein, free speech and the global warming debate : Comments
By Anthony Cox, published 8/3/2012Why would Ray Finkelstein think that his News Media Council should have anything to do with global warming claims?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Page 12
-
- All
5,
There is no end. There is no completion, closing of the circle, or becoming at one with God. There is only muddling, confusion, wrong-headness, idiocy, uncertainty, change (cf. Heraclitus), unfinishedness, loose ends, misuse and pure evil, and general chaos in life in general, and in government in particular, of which the present Gillard government is but one, rather negative, example.
That's democracy, imperfect, even defective, at times seeming to unravel then ravel again, the clash of classes which are always undergoing differential changes in their fortunes due largely to what Marx would have called 'the development of productive forces', and therefore experiencing a shifting balance of power, and hence changes in government. A pretty lousy system, but as somebody is supposed to have said, it sure beats whatever comes second.
That has to be the system that we live with, try to improve, and support, along with its accompanying - and definitional - freedoms, of speech, of assembly and of expression. This includes the media. Every ratbag and idiot should be allowed the right to express herself - just as much as you or I can as representatives of our superior class of people. Our inferiors should have the rights that we take for granted - that's the essence of democracy, a precious but fragile flower, easily trampled, and we all have to cope with the consequences of its workings.
Greg Melleuish has a great article on this subject in today's Australian, in which he concludes:
"Free politics requires freedom of expression. It requires vigorous debate. Without that debate there are many, especially in sections of the government and of the universities, who would love nothing more than to have a monopoly over ideas in this country."
The article is just under one by a Labor Party member, Graham Richardson, and alongside another article by another Labour Party member, Barry Cohen. Just what you would expect from a Murdoch rag.
Cheers,
Joe