Rather than muckraking about (has-been politicians) Pauline Hanson, and about (long gone) White Australia Immigration Policy.The "national consultation on the Anti-Racism" might better serve "social cohesion" if they were to study how two of the three persons mentioned here:
http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/extremists-jailed-for-evil-terror-plot-20111216-1oy37.html

Got past our (to quote Lexi) <<STRINGENT LAWS>> << where "people with questionable histories are immediately sifted out>>

And, under what big hearted humanitarian scheme were they passed to settle in OZ --a country & culture the judge says they so despised.

Australians are waking up en masse about what is REALLY happening here. I myself recently started questioning everything and I've come to the conclusion that non-white immigration to EVERY white country is effectively genocide and it is planned.

There are no white countries with a fertility rate above replacement and they're all being swamped with hoardes and hoardes of immigrants. Japan has a fertility lower than most white countries, but it doesn't need unbearable amounts of immigrants.

By definition, this is genocide - pure and simple.

"In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;"

http://www.hrweb.org/legal/genocide.html

Australia's national, ethnical and racial grouping has obliterated - not just in part. Urbanisation, feminism, promotion of homosexuality, consumerism - every measure intended to destroy the family unit is contributing to lower fertility rates. This is not just some fanciful new culture infesting white countries, it is planned and PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP. What is happening here is the most diabolical thing on earth - certainly more diabolical than anything the die-hard COMMIES whinge about incessantly.

Keep throwing around your epithets - bogan, racist, bigot, nazi, supremacist, this white Australian couldn't care less what I'm called anymore.

Woah! This is the most depressing set of comments I've ever read at this site. davidf is spot on in his definition of racism and it's very sad to see so many at this site openly want to revert to the days when Australia was racist in policy. However, they are a minority. When they stand for parliament, they are crapped on by the voters. Like the Greens, they get around 10% of the vote and then claim to speak for everyone else.

In 1986 or 1987, the Commonwealth Government undertook a major study of suburbs in which large numbers of Asian migrants had been recently settling. I can't remember the name of the report (even though I did review it back then) but its findings were most informative. It found a much higher level of racism among those who did not have Asians as neighbours and far less among those who lived near them and actually knew them as people.

This mixing is why we rarely have race riots in this country and, when we do, they are provoked by small groups who are opposed by the great majority. Real problems arise, though, in times of economic crisis when new arrivals are blamed for unemployment. They're much easier to target than the capitalist system, I suppose, which is the real culprit

Dear observed,

I think you are correct that there is non-white immigration to EVERY white country. I disagree that it is planned.

It is the result of modern medicine and sanitation which has decreased infant mortality rates and increased the life span past infancy. It is also the result of women being kept in ignorance and not having knowledge of or access to birth control and abortion. The death rate has gone down faster than the birth rate. It is difficult for a country to retain the increase. Therefore some people leave.

As a result there is a great population increase. The same thing happened in the white world. At first there was a great population increase, but white women stopped having as many babies. The knowledge of methods of birth control, education for women and the availability of abortion brought the birth rate down. As a result some countries have a birth rate of less than 2 per woman. This is less than the replacement rate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependent_territories_by_fertility_rate lists countries by fertility rates. There are many countries where women during their child bearing years have fewer than two children on average. There are 230 countries listed in the list compiled by the CIA Factbook. 99 of those countries on the list have 2 or fewer children produced by each woman of child bearing age. Of those 99 countries 40 are mainly populated by people of non-European descent.

The process by which women of European descent stopped having so many babies can be repeated all over the world. Educate women and give them access to birth control and abortion. Unfortunately there is great opposition from some religious groups to this program, but we can try to put pressure on our government to promote these actions in their foreign aid programme.

Dear byork,

Racism is not restricted to capitalism. The Marxist countries did not eliminate racism. There were many instances of it in the USSR and China. In addition they murdered millions due to their class identification. I don't see a lot of difference between class murder and race murder.

David,
I may have misjudged you, no person who is aware of all the issues around population and immigration could possibly be an anti Racist, it would be an immoral stance.
What we see before us in the so called Liberal democratic countries is the synthesis of Second Generation Communism and monopoly capitalism. Think of it as a sort of Eugenic Hegemony, replete with utopian imagery and the ideal Nietzschian styled "Post Racial" superman.
http://www.racialcompact.com/Time_Fall_1993-2.JPG
I don't believe you'd support Eugenics, no normal person does, only sickos want a blended humanity.
But we make the point that ONLY White people in White countries are subjected to Anti Racist laws, Emma West is in jail in the UK for a Racial speech crime, yet a gang of Somali girls who bashed a young White British woman and tore out a clump of her hair while screaming "Kill the White slag!" were set free without punishment by a magistrate.
Footage of the assault on Rhea Page, as you can see, if her male friend hadn't been there she most likely would have been killed, he had his hands full just protecting himself, the assailants also repeatedly tried to attack the couple even after the Police had arrived:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgIN4kBsNRg

Emma West's outburst was inappropriately timed but all she really did was annoy other travellers, who promptly put her in her place, at the end of the trip they would all have gone home and forgotten about the incident, this kind of squabbling happens on public transport every day:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fd8iYLvlQaM

So David Which is worse. in your opinion, who should be in jail and who should be free?
This is the type of thing that White people have to put up with all the time, this is why they get angry and emotional over Racial issues.

Byork,
It's telling that, in your mind your earlier post creates no dissonance.
Monopolist Capitalism is clearly the culprit in the impoverishment and disenfranchisement of the world's lower castes, including Europeans, what you are misrepresenting is the role trans-national migration plays in the capitalist's schemes.
You can't oppose Capitalism and support Immigration, they're part of the same program.

If we take the original justifications for Multiculturalism and mass Third World Migration to White countries at face value we may also come up with another set of arguments against continuation of these programs.
The early proponents of Multiculturalism expressed a desire to end "Anglo Saxon" (ie British) domination of Australian society and had a vision of a more continental style of cosmopolitan democracy.
This has not come to pass, Australia is still under full British political, economic and social control and while elements of the authentic Cosmopolitanism which began to manifest itself in the '70's and '80's still linger they are fast being eclipsed by what passes for Global capitalist "culture".
In this respect multiculturalism is a failure, it has not delivered what was promised.
The second way of justifying mass Third world immigration was economic, that there were jobs to be filled, jobs that Whites would not do and so on.
This argument may have been valid in the 1950's when we had a productive society with massive infrastructure projects, a large manufacturing sector and plentiful opportunities out in the regions but it isn't sustainable today.
The only economic sectors in this country at present are population growth and mining, immigration actually comes at a cost rather than a net benefit, we are literally losing money on population growth.
http://candobetter.net/node/977