I notice that the articles author is chairman of a group advocating 'diversity' so I take with a big grain of salt what he has to say.

I cannot see any practical advantages 'diversity' itself brings, except maybe some differing cusine.

For me I see social cohesion and maintaining our social standards far more important than encouraging 'diversity'. We are doing ourselves no favours if we do not have a critical look at some aspects of some cultures, before allowing some to enter for the sake of 'diversity'

I think the author uses 'Racism' merely to attract attention.

A lot more Australians know about the deliberate attempt to turn all white countries brown i.e GENOCIDE since those days.

Africa for the Africans,Asia for the Asians,white countries for EVERYBODY!

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Banjo,
Chairman of a group of one, these "Anti Racist" groups are usually husband and wife teams and the larger groups with some level of actual funding are at most half a dozen strong.
However you will notice there's at least one Anti Racist in every town or suburb, every school, every workplace, we call them Political Correctness Officers, self appointed, pompous,overbearing, the office Hitlers we all know so well.
If you want an open debate about immigration then you first have to identify and silence the PCO in your midst,isolate them and take away their power to squash debate.
I noticed the Mantra posted above, that's a memetic tool designed to shut down anti Racists, memorise it and use it on the PCO's in your life.

Another poster recognised that Multiculturalism is not specifically defined by lawmakers as a Racial policy, it's primarily an economic measure.
But, it is a Racial policy simply because it's ONLY implemented White nations and ONLY White nations are expected to submit to a radical change in their genetic makeup.
So "Racial and Religious tolerance" laws, the enforcement regimes of Multiculturalism are actually "Race Laws" becaue they discriminate on the basis of race.
There are no "Race Laws" in Vietnam, or Sudan, or Tonga.
White countries and ONLY White countries are said to need "Race Laws".

Jay,
Any chance of you getting copy of full text of what the judge said yesterday when sentencing those would be terrorists?

Australia is a very tolerant nation. While there may be a few racist elements, generally we have a harmonious society based on tolerance. However, all the multiculturalism being forced onto Australia assumes that we don't have a culture of our own, and that other cultures must be blended on as ongoing overlays. Australia is not a blank canvas, with no cultural heritage. This anti-"racist" campaign is to make the public feel guilt about any resistance to ongoing mass immigration. We already have a mix of many cultures, so we don't need more cultures and more immigration. There's limits to population growth - not only environmental, but social as well.

Anti-racist may be a code word for anti-white to some people on this list. Not to me. Racism is seeing the value of a person in the colour of their skin or their ethnic origins. Anti-racism is ignoring the colour of their skin or ethnic origins in seeing the value of a person and opposing bigots who do see things that way. Racists may have any colour skin. Racism stinks regardless of what a racist looks like.

The United States has been a racist country in the past in keeping black people in slavery. Part of the population is still racist. However, they have moved away from racism enough to have elected a man with dark skin as president. From keeping black people in slavery to electing Obama as president is a tremendous advance. Barack Hussein Obama kept a name which indicated both his black and Muslim ancestry and, bearing that name, was elected president. I am proud of him and proud of my country for electing him. I voted for him by absentee ballot not for his colour but because I thought he would make a better president than his worthy opponent.

John Brown tried to end slavery and died in the attempt. He was hanged in 1859 for attempting a revolt to free the slaves. Presiding over that execution was Robert E. Lee who led an army in revolt against his country to preserve slavery. Lee’s revolt failed, and he surrendered after much bloodshed. He was honoured even though he was a traitor and fought for an ignoble cause.

As far as I am concerned Lee was a racist traitor. In August of this year I was with my son in the Adirondacks and visited the grave of John Brown who was buried a few miles from my grandparents old house. Unlike many Abolitionists who objected to slavery but still thought a black man was not quite as good as a white man John Brown was not prejudiced. He recognised all humans regardless of their skin colour as equally worthy. So do I.