The Forum > Article Comments > No god doesn’t mean life is dull, monotonous or pointless > Comments
No god doesn’t mean life is dull, monotonous or pointless : Comments
By Jake Farr-Wharton, published 4/11/2011A naturalistic interpretation of the universe is both valid and far from depressing.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
-
- All
Posted by The Acolyte Rizla, Friday, 11 November 2011 10:50:34 PM
| |
aj/quote..""I never lose sight of the fact
that applied reasoning based on logical absolutes..is the only reliable method we have for arriving at the truth,"" applied reasoning..goes beyond the known..into the unknown if so then you need your absolute certainties..to be absolutly certain so we know..life comes from life thus we know life couldnt have happend by chance somehow life must have began the living...[the bible says god blew life into clay;we know that life energy was a result energy cant be created nor destroyed this too is absolute..so think where the life energy goes..when life appears to end...[keeping in mind the law of atophy] ""given what we currently know,"" rationalises that we are able to reaason we might in the future know[confirm] ""and anyone cares who about the truth of their beliefs;"" yes anyone who cares...about the ultimate truth verifying their beliefs ""anyone who wants as fewer false beliefs as possible, should never lose sight of this."" yes i agree aj <<Being blind to anything but this illusory part of reality...>> ""When we talk about reality and anything that is real, the only way we can have any dialogue is if we talk about what’s real to both of us and/or demonstrable."" lets presume..you replying revealing a logical deduction..confirms reality why is yours relivant..and our irrelivant? ""Anything that doesn’t fit into that category"" you deem as being based in fact ""doesn’t deserve to be described as “real”,..in my opinion."" yes in your OPINION..[by your hunch] by your hope..but not by your facts just your opinion..[as valid as our opinion] to you..""It’s more just an esoteric experience."" esoteric;'intended or understood by only a select group of people..with special knowledges continues Posted by one under god, Saturday, 12 November 2011 6:21:47 AM
| |
continued
to us its a guide to live by to inform our actions..to kick start our humanity a measure of how we match our future with our mortal past a way to forgive those who tress-pass against us..[and face the day by turning the other cheek we must not adopt creed nor greed [nor the other spiritual sins..that only have the assurance that in the next life more shall be a given] ""You scoff at my insistence..on evidence,"" maTE..TILL YOU READ THE BOOK..YOU CANT GRASP THE CONCEPTS ""yet what’s my alternative?"" find a common startpoint area where we can talk as equals not preach or talk past each other ""To just buy into everything you guys are saying"" makes you feel ""like a mindless drone.. staring blankly at the monitor and drooling?"" this is not why god gave you the life gift '"By what mechanism am I supposed to be able to determine the truth value of any of your claims?"" first see god in everything see your not doing it..its all being done for you think..your heart beats the best science can give is its natural autonimus reflex realise science tries to exoplain realise medicine greek/latin names only describe the sympton that ohh so clever..word ..natural selection means science aint doing it the list gets endless once you realise..science isnt god [think who first thunk man[clay]..god breathing life into clay you must have heard the science theorize the first cell was a clay bubble..[lol] a cel membrain is much more than a clay bubble but thats seriously what the science hypotheorises no one can be thought of as a fool if they ask logical questions [or try to give reasond reply its not about relieon/creed its about you finding your own voice with god] just you just him [no esoterric trick needed] his voice is that still inner voice of love/grace/mercy/life/other *not..the inner voice of vengeance/hate fear/death/self etc Posted by one under god, Saturday, 12 November 2011 6:34:31 AM
| |
one under god,
? L '¿por qué socialia manera non? , Si non nobis paquete t? Usted? ; Contribuye n Una vez más payante;? Porque nadie que no puede se considerar blasph incluyendo palabra la? merde, en quoi conferencia importaciones las. ¿Por qué non? ; T Los componentes peor y su sedaciones adoptar a nobis es más, detiene se? Puede mi? , T Si previsto Habia, que a debido vengas con el que es una prueba de lo contrario EXAMEN [paragemisete] en Este - parce qu? En Austrum dolor momento? , Se con? , A Debido lata su 'l de La Guerra giran enumerar a con el idiota? , Non-T entre simplicia Senonas Posted by The Acolyte Rizla, Saturday, 12 November 2011 11:38:19 AM
| |
the alco-lite
on meds..wrote.. quote ""? L 'why socialization as non?"": why anti social ""If non nobis t package?"" if d ikless ""You? ; Contributes Again payante n;?"" ""Because no one..that can not be considered blasph including word?..m erde,""[removed profanity] m erde is ccccc rap ""imports in the conference quoi. Why non?"" i cant be botherd with your game ""components and sedation worse nobis is to adopt, stop it?"" just dont take your meds then ok? ""Can I? T If He had planned, which come"" thats up to you..not him ""due in that proves otherwise REVIEW [paragemisete] in East - parce qu?"" too political your only confirming my opinions ""In Austrum pain now? , Was with?"" i think the 'u'..is a missstrikle it was meant to be an 's'? ""A can Because its' l War to turn the idiot list?..Non-T between Simplicia Senones"" its your list see your name is right there..on top no further reply to off topic trolls considerd sort it out yourself http://translate.google.com/#auto|en|%3F%20L%20'%C2%BFpor%20qu%C3%A9%20socialia%20manera%20non%3F%20%2C%20Si%20non%20nobis%20paquete%20t%3F%20Usted%3F%20%3B%20Contribuye%20n%20Una%20vez%20m%C3%A1s%20payante%3B%3F%20Porque%20nadie%20que%20no%20puede%20se%20considerar%20blasph%20incluyendo%20palabra%20la%3F%20merde%2C%20en%20quoi%20conferencia%20importaciones%20las.%20%C2%BFPor%20qu%C3%A9%20non%3F%20%3B%20T%20Los%20componentes%20peor%20y%20su%20sedaciones%20adoptar%20a%20nobis%20es%20m%C3%A1s%2C%20detiene%20se%3F%20Puede%20mi%3F%20%2C%20T%20Si%20previsto%20Habia%2C%20que%20a%20debido%20vengas%20con%20el%20que%20es%20una%20prueba%20de%20lo%20contrario%20EXAMEN%20%5Bparagemisete%5D%20en%20Este%20-%20parce%20qu%3F%20En%20Austrum%20dolor%20momento%3F%20%2C%20Se%20con%3F%20%2C%20A%20Debido%20lata%20su%20'l%20de%20La%20Guerra%20giran%20enumerar%20a%20con%20el%20idiota%3F%20%2C%20Non-T%20entre%20simplicia%20Senonas Posted by one under god, Saturday, 12 November 2011 3:17:32 PM
| |
Dear AJ Philips,
I am not here to waste your time, nor, I hope, are you here to waste mine. It is not my intention to prove the unprovable, nor to convince those who do not want to be convinced. I was merely responding to your former claim that "None of you know any of this!", insisting that my God is new and denying that He has been known for thousands of years (in the east). What rational basis have you for such claims? Yes, life without god is possible, and perhaps even need not necessarily be dull monotonous and pointless - by that I mean that we could do away with a creator and maintainer in the traditional sense. But life without God is a logical impossibility, akin to ocean without water - it is life without life. What I say is that life without God is inconceivable - it is a meaningless combination of words. This article has two flaws: the first is that when referring to "god" the author automatically assumed only the traditional version of the Judeo-Christian concept. The second is that while the article attempts to refute the "dull" and "monotonous" parts (by demonstrating how wonderful the world is), it puts not even a single argument against the pointlessness of life without God. That's a basic error in logic, of making a deduction about something unrelated - he could just as well have claimed "No god doesn’t mean life is dull, monotonous or dangerous" or "dull, monotonous or ugly". Perhaps the author believes that where there is action, fun and sophistication there is also a point: that has no basis, but it may explain why he cannot stand the solemnity of religion. As mentioned, I have no problem with atheists - my problem is with another new pseudo-religion that tries to delegitimize any religion but theirs. My problem is with Pericles who jumped on your wagon praising you with glee for your contribution toward destroying religion. Posted by Yuyutsu, Monday, 14 November 2011 1:09:56 AM
|
This one was a bit of a head-scratcher, but I think I figured it out. Something about Jesus sheltering from the wind in a coffee shop, right? A little cryptic... but then drunks never do make much sense.
For the record, I don't drink alcohol. It kills your brain cells, and I'd really hate the thought of ending up like you.