The Forum > Article Comments > Rethinking the White Australia Policy > Comments
Rethinking the White Australia Policy : Comments
By Andrew Fraser, published 28/9/2005Andrew Fraser calls for the re-establishment of the White Australia Policy on racial groundsv.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Page 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
- All
Redneck , all i can say is you had better keep your hard hat on , cheers, kartiya .
Posted by kartiya, Friday, 14 October 2005 8:46:09 AM
| |
I havent gone anyone Redneck- I really like your 'violent' assertions- must be some pent up anger building up over those 10 hours of work.But in the immortal words of one very famous children's character, 'Can Redneck fix it, yes he can'.
As for one famous black swimmer- Eric the eel from the Sydney Olympics springs to mind. Sure he didnt win nothing, but he won national fame and our hearts with his efforts- so does this count? I really love how you need to reassure yourself of how good you are and how you have won etc etc. Are you as a white person feeling a bit insecure Posted by scooper9, Friday, 14 October 2005 4:53:33 PM
| |
Gee Scooper, did you, Kenny and Mahatma Sitting Duck get all of your liberal values from watching children’s TV shows like “Bob the Builder”, “South Park” and “The Simpsons”? You three keep quoting from these shows to validate your views.
I don’t suppose “Eric the eel” does qualify as a famous champion swimmer. I for one have never heard of him. And if he did not win any races, then I would deduce it was because genetically, black people make lousy swimmers. As for feeling “insecure”, I think that you are misunderstanding my tactics. Too many trendy lefties such as your self really do feel the need to put on airs and present themselves as the enlightened ones, who are oh, so bloody clever and morally superior. Many young people, eager to present themselves to the adult world as possessing a positive adult image, adopt your values and attitudes as a fashion statement indicating their higher social aspirations. They tend to parrot whatever their trendy social superiors inculcate them with. My primary goal is to stick a pin in a few inflated ego’s, by pointing out to my educated “superiors”, that even an uneducated tradesman can make mincemeat out of your loopy social theories. It is also to demonstrate to our young, easily led and gullible, that people like you do not have a clue what you are talking about. Posted by redneck, Friday, 14 October 2005 6:40:02 PM
| |
Posted by Reason, Friday, 14 October 2005 7:27:47 PM
| |
Hi Mr "Reason".
I do not try to get involved in topics on this site which are already well underway and already have twenty or more replies posted. This is because I don't wish to have to read all the replies first in order to get up to speed on what has already been said. If you had bothered to read all the posts first before you barged in here with your sneery one liner, you would have discovered that I have already posted information that the geneticists appear to agree with me. The Human Genome geneticists sponsored a conference in the USA entitled "Genetic Factor in Crime". The NAACP (national Associating for thre Advancemaent of Coloured People) went beserk and pulled out all stops to have the conference banned. They lobbied the US Congress, threatening the withdrawal of "coloured" votes in marginal electorates unless Congress gred to withdraw reseach funding from any scientist who dared to submit evidence to the conference. A similar conference of esteemed geneticists in London was held in camera with the media and the public pointedly excluded. This appears to me that what the geneticists already know might start the mother of all furores. The evidence that you submitted is interesting, but I will take it with a grain of salt until I can hear what all geneticists agree upon. Posted by redneck, Saturday, 15 October 2005 4:39:48 AM
| |
"Thank you for this, thank you for that" but no thank you as understood from the following:
http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/10/97175.php Posted by MichaelK., Sunday, 16 October 2005 3:41:23 PM
|