The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The problems with Eatock v Bolt > Comments

The problems with Eatock v Bolt : Comments

By Graham Young, published 3/10/2011

Australians are now much less free than they were to discuss matters of race, to the detriment of proper, functioning democracy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 9
  7. 10
  8. 11
  9. Page 12
  10. All
Own goal, Jay,

Breivik, the murderer of nearly eighty people, manifestly 'Anti-Racists', is surely on your team, the White Supremacists ?

Just saying :)

Joe
Posted by Loudmouth, Thursday, 6 October 2011 11:35:08 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Joe,
What the?
Breivik hates "White supremacists", his hero is Max Manus, he is said to have dated non White girls and had many immigrant friends in his youth.
If anything it was a clash of the two streams of Anti Racism on Utoya.
Leftist and "respectable" conservative Anti Racists disagree on a lot of points but they all agree that anyone who speaks up on behalf of White people is a Nazi who is going to bring Hitler back, they say it all the time, Bolt eve said "Racist" views were akin to those expressed in Nazi Germany.

Errata: Jock Palfreeman is in jail in Bulgaria, not Hungary, I was typing in a hurry.
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Thursday, 6 October 2011 5:55:40 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Jay,

I freaking love white people: anybody who tells you that whitey has not done more for mankind than any other skin colour is talking shyt, 'coz whitey is way over-represented in the annals of scientific discovery - and it is science and his close bedfellow technology who contribute most to the betterment of mankind.

But this has nowt to do with 'race'. Whitey isn't better than darkie because he belongs to a different race - whitey and darkie are equal, and both members of the same race: the human race. Whitey was just in the right place at the right time.
Posted by The Acolyte Rizla, Thursday, 6 October 2011 11:08:12 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well said, TAR.
Posted by TrashcanMan, Thursday, 6 October 2011 11:13:09 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
TAR.
Find a post of mine to which that line of thinking relates.
You're only taking me to task because I'm White, you say you are anti Racist, what you are is anti White, anti Racist is just a code word for anti White.

Until the cosmos realigns or the "Space Brothers' come and re wire the African's DNA the world remains as it is, Nairobi is never going to look like Vienna unless it's razed and re-built by Austrians.

Actually you guys are playing your side all wrong, the typical Anti Racist line is that White people EVOLVED from Black people, we faded or changed colour from drinking milk...or something.
Think about the implied inferiority of Black people which that line of reasoning entails.
See anti Racists want to make all White societies and only White societies into Brown societies, to take them back to their roots, so to speak. The fact that their plans have met with nothing but dismal failure every time they've gained some momentum seems not to deter them. They even re jigged Marxist socialism from Scientific Materialism to Scientific Racism and managed to shoot backwards at warp speed while alienating their hitherto faithful White working class.
That's the problem with attempted Genocides, they never work, there are estimated to be as many if not more people of Indigenous Australian descent than there were 200 years ago when all this malarkey got started.
In fact the effect of the attempted Genocide has been to create a Race, "Aboriginals" (Koori if you like) out of a previously diverse population.
So it is with White Australians, Anti Racists have tried to wipe us out by flooding the country with Third Worlders and in doing so have defined the White Australian ethnicity and set us on a course toward ethnocentrism.
Every non White migrant knows what an "Aussie" looks like, we're the whole reason they come here and most of them really like us.
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Friday, 7 October 2011 6:59:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Jay,

(1) If anti-racist is fully synonymous with anti-white as you claim it to be, it follows logically that racist is fully synonymous with white, unless the prefix 'anti' assumes different meanings.

(2) I have already stated I am anti-racist.

(3) I have also already stated that I am white.

(4) Hence, I am racist (from (1) and (3)).

Therefore: I simultaneously anti-racist and racist (from (2) and (4)).

This is a textbook reductio ad impossible, and it means that your premises are flawed.
Posted by The Acolyte Rizla, Sunday, 9 October 2011 12:41:52 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 9
  7. 10
  8. 11
  9. Page 12
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy