Antiseptic,

I think you'd have a enormous difficulty recognising a polynesian person in the absence of visual clues. Race might exist, but it doesn't exist in the dark - and biology is not determined by whether or not the lights are on. If you attempted to single out polynesian people from others using only their genome, I am quite confident that you would fail to succeed.

I have no problem with sociological theories regarding race - but within the field of biology, the notion of race is only marginally more credible than intelligent design.

Jay,

I dislike having to repeat myself, but as for your paranoid ravings about white genocide: where I come from, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. So prove it: show me a single example of ANYBODY calling for the 'Final Solution' to the white problem, and I'll be slightly less inclined to believe that are either barking mad, or a complete twat with the intellect of a gerbil.

Trashcanman,if you're not promoting genocide I have no problem with you but I wonder why do you even feel the need to bring up your personal life?
Being anti Racist and Anti Race are just two arguments being used to justify the assimilation of White people into the Third World.
The definition of use of "Force" is commonly left to the target group in these situations, I have no choice but to live around people from the Third world so in my mind that constitutes a use of force.
Tibetans have no choice in the matter of Han Chinese flooding into their living spaces and neither do I, a Tibetan who takes the part of the Han Chinese and demands special rights and privileges for them would be called a traitor, I feel strongly about White people who side with migrants and demand that they have special rights (ie to choose who shares their living space) and I should be denied those rights.
Third world migrants have a choice, either live in a mono racial country of their birth or come here, there are no White countries left on the planet so I am denied that choice, there's no White country for me to move to if I wanted to.
Punjabis can go through their whole lives with only other Punjabis as neigbours if they so choose, so can Vietnamese,Iraqis and Afghans, they have that choice.I don't have that choice, you see in Graham's piece the way he views "segregationists", that we're suspect and might get him into trouble, that's a typical anti Racist position to take.
Did that situation come about by "Natural selection", no, it was a deliberate act to reduce the population of White people in Europe, North America and Australia, the people promoting multiculturalism stated that as their goal.
Only White countries are being targeted for assimilation by Anti Racists, those same people cry over Tibetan children being forced to live with Han Chinese but are glowing with pride as Han Chinese migrants flood into my children's home.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfB_F936bU8

Graham _____:____ Bromberg J looks at a line of cases, and the way in which the act was negotiated through parliament and concludes that to come within the ambit of the act you must have made a statement for reasons which include race and offended someone of that race, but that the plaintiffs do not have to demonstrate racial hatred.

Comment:

Bolt is not the only victim.

Australians need not be regarded as members of a racist community, however Australians do suffer a racist problem.

Australian problem is racist government.

Government control of the Parliament - regardless of party in control.

This results from team-centric game-playing by our legislators.

Disadvantaged are attempts to reasonably consider legislation, and the consequences of legislation, whether in draft or under review.

Australia's "racial discrimination" legislature is typical, examine all those exemptions from applying legislation and see how it supports racist outlooks.

example: Look to communities existing under the various "Land Rights" legislations where racism develops as the norm.

Typical from these government products are their arguments to justify exemptions allowing refusal of leases to tenants.

Also find justified is segregation, the separation of entire communities from wider Australia, the segregation of families on the basis of racial tests - which the Commonwealths Attorney-General told Parliament do NOT exist.

Both governments and the HREOC refuses to conduct public hearings into complaints arising from these problems.

Governments - and the HREOC, need dump their "acceptable flavor approaches" to racism, such the larger part of the problem !

Antiseptic.
There's research being done into the possible biological causes for "Racism", the studies of the effects of Oxytocin are particularly worrying.
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/01/06/1015316108

So we have the disturbing prospect of Anti Racists in the scientific community looking for a biological explanation for Racism and the Anti Racist activists using that as yet another justification for White Genocide.
Remember anti Racists only care about Racism in White countries and they only support assimilation in White countries, they are Anti Racist and only identify White people as having a race problem.
If they can construct a Genetic or biological basis for their Genocidal beliefs about Whites they'll use it, you can bank on that

Most high profile Geneticists and Biologists profess Anti Racism, sure, they have to to that simply in order to work but we know that Stephen Jay Gould for example was Anti Racist and identified White people as perpetrators in his "Mismeasure of Man" hypothesis.
Anti Racists still love old Stephen Jay even though he's looking like he might have been little more than a biased, Anti White whose 1981 book was as we say "full of factual errors.
"http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/14/science/14skull.html
We see it on this board all the time, Gould mocked and denigrated Murray and Hernstein, so too his acolytes in the anti Racist camp mock, berate, threaten and deride those who challenge them.
Anti Racists are nasty thugs, observe:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNA3YMmC9zM

HJay,

In connection with your claims of White genocide, I'm still waiting for a definition of genocide, of something which is supposed to be happening. No rush :)

Joe

Jay,

You are aware that not all sources of information are equally credible, aren't you? And that random nutcases shooting their mouths off on YouTube are about as credible a source of information as 'what some bloke down the pub told me'? After watching them, I have two questions:

What is the chick in the first video on, and where can I get some?

Where is the thuggery I'm supposed to be looking for in the second video? I watched until about halfway before I got bored, but all I saw was some skinny nerd talking to a camera. It's really not cricket to promise good old fashioned biffo and then deliver a talking head: that's false advertising.