The Forum > Article Comments > The problems with Eatock v Bolt > Comments
The problems with Eatock v Bolt : Comments
By Graham Young, published 3/10/2011Australians are now much less free than they were to discuss matters of race, to the detriment of proper, functioning democracy.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
-
- All
Posted by Antiseptic, Thursday, 6 October 2011 3:51:40 AM
| |
Jay, oxytocin is a tremendously powerful hormone responsible for a huge range of effects. I see no reason that the drive to tribalism would not be a part of that.
Posted by Antiseptic, Thursday, 6 October 2011 3:55:21 AM
| |
Joe,
http://www.un.org/millennium/law/iv-1.htm Rizla, She's a good looking White woman all right, but most White women are beautiful, ugliness only comes from a bad character. Never mind that the second video entirely backs the thesis in the first, ie that anti Racism is just a code word for Anti White. Calling someone a Nazi is in effect calling for them to be killed, because that's what they do with "Nazis" don't they? Drawing a moustache and "Hitler fringe" on the image of that lady is painting her as the world's greatest mass murderer, the only reason he's targeted her is because of her pro White views. There have been videos put up calling for that woman to be raped by black men, killed, etc, etc and that clown threatens violence by calling her a "Nazi". Anti racists actually have no point to make other than their Anti White views, and you have to read the words I post Anti RACIST is a code word for Anti White because they only identify White people as Racists. I'm not talking about healthy, normal people who try to treat all races the same just for the sake of harmony I'm talking about people who want to destroy my race, who make a point of denigrating, vilifying and threatening pro White people and even innocent "civilians" and children. Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Thursday, 6 October 2011 5:30:56 AM
| |
Jay,
"Calling someone a Nazi is in effect calling for them to be killed, because that's what they do with "Nazis" don't they?" Well, apart from Adolf Eichmann, what Nazis have been killed in the last fifty years ? So is this your series of long bows: * 'anti-racism' means 'anti-white', * 'anti-white' means 'calling someone a Nazi', * 'calling someone a Nazi' is 'inciting other people to kill a Nazi', * 'inciting people to kill a Nazi means genocide of White people'. Ergo: 'anti-racist' means 'genocide of White people' ? Is that how it works ? Is that all there is ? Posted by Loudmouth, Thursday, 6 October 2011 9:44:15 AM
| |
Jay,
I got the impression from your earlier posts that you thought all people who were anti-racism were therefore anti-white and secretly wanting the demise of the white race, i.e. genocide. Which is what I saw as being ridiculous. Not liking people who hate for ignorant reasons can hardly be automatically interpreted to mean one hates white people. However, I now realise you are really identifying a specific group in society who, yes, may hate white people and hide it as anti-racism or anti-nazism etc. You should probably have made that a little more clear earlier. I don't disagree that these people do exist. This group however, represent a very small sub-set of society. I think it is a long bow, to borrow Joe Loudmouth's words, to infer they are having any influence over policy, public opinion etc. and very unlikely that there is any chance of "genocide" ever occurring. There are indeed crazies who believe all sorts of things and get fired up over it to the point of aggression and violence. Some of them get together in big enough groups that they are able to avoid paying tax because they hold these crazy beliefs (e.g. scientology). I am a very strong anti-racist, but I acknowledge racism comes from people of all races. In fact, I think it is impossible for anyone, even myself, not to have racist notions at times. Be it homoracism or heteroracism (I admit, I experience both, much to my own dismay). In reference to white people having nowhere to go that's all white. Well, the British, French, Spanish, Dutch etc all sowed that seed a long time ago when they started moving into everyone else's homeland. This was an all-black country 220 years ago before the mass immigration of Europeans began. There are now white people living in every country in the world. You want one set of rules for whites, and another set for the rest. It's an unreasonable stance that just won't wash. Posted by TrashcanMan, Thursday, 6 October 2011 10:31:53 AM
| |
Joe,
No of course not, as in all cases of attempted genocide all the little things, the slurs, the jokes, the vilification feed into and enable the overall, larger criminal enterprise.The guy in the video called the Original Savage Chick (I don't know her name) a B*tchy version of David Duke and Hitler then defaced an image of her to make it resemble Adolf Hitler. C'mon Joe, you're not naive, the "Kill all the Nazis" meme is ubiquitous in popular culture, anyone who is branded a "Nazi" is said to fair game for threats, intimdation, rape, murder...etc. Here's a few brief examples: Mate there's an Australian Anti Racist named Jock Palfreeman in jail in Hungary for murdering one man and wounding another because he presumed they were "racists" or "Nationalists". Two Swedish Nationalists were set upon in 2010 by an Antifa gang led by a man named Dennis Mirabelles and beaten with hammers resulting in life threatening head injuries to both, they nearly died in in tensive care. Example, the American Renaissance group tries to hold a conference every year in the U.S, every year Anti Racist thugs threaten the staff or owners of the proposed venue and the conference convenors with violence or make hoax bomb threats by phone. In 2009 they obtained personal details of hotel staff, approached their homes and threatened them and their families with violence if the conference went ahead. And then there's the topper of all anti Racist murderers Anders Behring Breivik, have we forgotten him so soon? As Graham said, I'm a minority of one here and I do have other commitments so I can only do so much to support my accusation of Attempted Genocide against anti Racists, I could ask for support from White Nationalists if you like but since I'm not one of them they probably wouldn't want to work with me. Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Thursday, 6 October 2011 10:52:50 AM
|
Well, I think I'd have a hard time recognising lots of things in the absence of visual clues. Why do you exempt our most important sense from the valid modes of observation? Moreover, visual cues are a very important part of human sexual behaviour.
I understand the point you're trying to make, but pretending that such differences are not relevant is akin to arguing that breeds of dogs with lots of specific characteristics other than just appearance are non-existent.
Founder effect and purposeful isolation from the broad canine population is what created the dog breeds. The same thing creates races in humans. the main difference is that dogs pay no attention to appearance in their own sexual selection, while for humans it is a very important cue.