The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Why my generation is wrong about gay marriage > Comments

Why my generation is wrong about gay marriage : Comments

By Blaise Joseph, published 14/9/2011

There is nothing wrong with a definition of marriage that discriminates - it is meant to.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 17
  7. 18
  8. 19
  9. Page 20
  10. 21
  11. 22
  12. All
Philo,

Any matter which ends up in the lower GI tract comes from the upper GI tract. For HPV to be present in the bowel, it must be ingested and pass through the stomach first. And the HCl present in the stomach is of sufficiently low pH to destroy the vast majority of viral particles, including HPV.
Posted by The Acolyte Rizla, Sunday, 25 September 2011 10:45:40 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The argument that children have historically done better in heterosexual families ignores the causality. i.e. is it the relationship of the parents that causes the problem? Or could it possibly be the alienation and persecution of the parents and their children by SOCIETY that has created this disparity between outcomes for the children?

Methinks it is most likely the latter, which is the very reason why recognised gay marriage should be put into legislation ASAP.
Posted by TrashcanMan, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 11:20:19 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
TrashcanMan

Drug abuse and suicide is much more frequent among homosexuals in big cities than in rural areas in the US in spite of the fact that it is less socially rejected in big cities. So then the homosexual subculture and style of living which is more prominent and characteristic in big cities seem to be responsible for these negative phenomena rather than the social rejection of homosexuality.
Posted by Mary Ward was here AMDG, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 10:21:35 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A homosexual couple means a bad example for children and young people who copy social examples when they form their ideal, way of thinking, values and behavior in connection with relationships and sex. A society with such a model of homosexual relationships wouldn't work, it would collapse demographically. So it is necessary for any human society to sideline and strictly limit such a model - and any other model (say bisexual, TG etc.) that would undermine its survival. This limiting might happen by law by everyday behavior (habits etc.) or both.

Marriage is about reproductive sex of heterosexual couples, about its defence and about the defence of raising children who are naturally conceived in them. It ever was. Any society that would give up such a model would sentence itself to gradual collapse.

Societies in the developed world are already slowly collapsing because of the often too low or declining fertility rates. Migration imight only be a temporary help like blood trasfusion for a person who have a grave and uncurable illness like cancer. This "no marriage no child" culture is spreading in the 3rd world, too, and it will eat them, too. When the normal family is no important any more, then might become widely accepted any other model - like homosexual lifestyle.

In a normal heterosexual society becoming a homosexual might often if not always be the result of some distortion in the family, its values or behavior, or some other serious psychological problem in childhood or the teen years. These might lead not only to homosexuality but to other consequences like drug abuse and the others. Promiscuity which is quite understandable in a relationship of two men might aggravate the personal psychological problems. So in a society where heterosexuality is the norm and rightly so homosexual persons are necessarily such persons that they usually cannot raise children properly and so marriage is not for them.
Posted by Mary Ward was here AMDG, Tuesday, 27 September 2011 10:25:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Mary you are talking bull dust and you know it, and your demeaning comments towards Gay people are nothing more than bullying.
Because your hateful comments feed the bigots and bullies, who cause young Gay people to self harm and suicide.
Would you dare say what you have face to face, with parents of a Gay child, of course not as you can stay invisible when spreading your bile!
Posted by Kipp, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 2:49:31 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Kipp,
Your arguments are nothing but bitter emotional reactions and not natural healthy reality for the defense of family.
You used these 12 words in three sentences:
"bull dust"
"demeaning comments towards Gay"
"bullying"
"hateful comments"
"bigots"
"bullies"
"bile"
Hardly a discussion or reasoned defense for gay marriage.
Posted by Philo, Wednesday, 28 September 2011 3:59:54 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 17
  7. 18
  8. 19
  9. Page 20
  10. 21
  11. 22
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy